All Activity

http://blogs.fangraphs.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/USATSI_24403084.jpgMegan Mendoza/The Republic/USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images The 33rd Arizona Fall League season opened last night with a single game in Scottsdale. There are future stars in the Fall League every year, as well as many more workmanlike players who are competing for a 40-man roster spot on next year’s club. It’s a wonderful league for teams to develop and scout prospects because of the cross section of talent it tends to include (there are usually lots of good position player prospects), its timing (which allows players who were injured during the regular season to catch up on reps), and its structure (which allows for six weeks of steady looks). Teams almost always take the AFL seriously and send players here who they want to see more of, or who they want to test. Being on the roster is, on its own, a flare. It’s an indication that a player is worth paying attention to from a scouting standpoint even if I didn’t know the guy’s name until I saw a roster. Previewing this league with prospects’ scouting reports risks putting the cart before the horse because the scouting part has yet to happen. I want to give you the reports I already have, to play the hits and make sure you have Kevin McGonigle and Josue De Paula reports and tool grades in front of you (don’t worry, you will), but a huge part of the pro scouting exercise that is the Arizona Fall League is mining for the deeper cut prospects, and I can’t tell you who those guys are going to be just yet. But I can show you the initial steps I take to prepare to go to the field and try to systematically unearth these guys, give you the tools to do so on your own, and, in the process, let know you who it is I’m most curious and excited to learn more about for the next six weeks. The players who become scouting “targets” tend to fall into a handful of categories, namely: Famous Players, Potential Dudes, Surface-Level Statistical Performers, TrackMan Performers, Players Who’ve Walked a Unique Path, and Players in a Key Roster Situation. The Famous Players are Top 100 prospects somewhere if not at FanGraphs; they were high-bonus guys when they signed or have already broken out, and you probably know who they are. Potential Dudes are prospects with burgeoning talent who might soon join the ranks of the famous as the industry becomes more confident that the player indeed profiles as an everyday big leaguer. This is arguably the most important subset of player in the entire league. I’m going to list and touch on the Famous Players and Potential Dudes for each Arizona Fall League roster below, but for in-depth scouting reports, tool grades, and video on these guys, you’re going to want to bookmark the 2025 Arizona Fall League tab on The Board, which Sean Dolinar and I have assembled for your convenience. These are pre-existing reports that I’ll add to and update throughout the next six weeks. The Surface-Level Statistical Performers are the guys who had impressive back-of-the-baseball-card stats this season. You can use the custom features on our Minor League Leaderboards to isolate the players on rosters and even create your own statistical categories of interest, just as I’ve done in the leaderboards linked just below this paragraph. Again, I’ll touch on the players who stood out in this regard for each Fall League squad below, but now you have the ability to access all of that data very easily. I’ll be referencing these on my laptop or phone throughout the fall (especially early on) as a way of familiarizing myself with how the deeper cut players did the during regular season. Remember, once you open the links, you can play with the leaderboards yourself, even if it’s just to isolate who your favorite team sent: 2025 Arizona Fall League Pitchers Stat Leaderboards 2025 Arizona Fall League Hitters Stat Leaderboard TrackMan Performers are players who stand out because of a different type of measurable. Rather than their batting average or stolen base totals, here we’re looking at what I’ll call “talent assessment metrics,” data that illustrates physical prowess instead of on-field performance. Who throws hard? Whose pitches move a lot? Who has a funky release point? Who hits the ball the hardest? These are integral aspects of contemporary player evaluation, but there’s no comprehensive public leaderboard for this stuff; it’s just a thing you have to find a way to access as a pseudo-journalistic analyst. The data of this sort that my friends and sources might send me can be vast. At the bottom of this post, I have assembled tables with what I consider to be the most basic, relevant subset of this type of data, and of course I touch on some standouts in the team sections below. The last two player categories are subjective in nature. Players in Key Roster Situations might include guys who are potentially being showcased for trade because of a logjam at their position, de-facto rehabbers who need innings in preparation for a big league role next year, players who’ll be exposed to other teams via the Rule 5 Draft this offseason if they aren’t added to the 40-man roster, or players who have been sent to Arizona to stay active in the event that their ring-chasing parent club suddenly needs them due to injuries. They’re players who a pro scouting department would care about more than they would in a vacuum because of these particulars. Unique Path players might include older guys signed out of Indy ball, or guys who are kind of a black box because they’ve been injured a lot, or have recently switched positions or sports. Basically, something related to their personal background indicates that they still have developmental ceiling. Other Stuff For Your Toolkit The Fall League rosters are here and are changing all the time. Even in the brief window between when I started writing this piece and published it, the rosters changed and some of the tables below have a superfluous guy or two. Unfortunately, we don’t have Arizona Fall League stats available on FanGraphs. For those you should go to the AFL’s website, which has other cool stuff like pitching probables and links to their live streams so you can watch the games. Now let’s touch on players from each AFL squad who fall into one of these categories. Please note that some players appear across multiple categories. Glendale Desert Dogs (Braves, White Sox, Dodgers, Cardinals, Blue Jays) Famous Players Josue De Paula, OF, Los Angeles Dodgers Hagen Smith, LHP, Chicago White Sox Braden Montgomery, OF, Chicago White Sox De Paula is a statuesque 20-year-old outfield prospect with elite plate discipline and exciting long-term power projection. This month I’ll be scrutinizing his plate coverage (most of his good contact comes on pitches right down the middle) and defense, which has been shaky for me in the past. Smith was a top five draft pick out of Arkansas in 2024. He has a killer fastball/slider combo, but he struggled with walks and injury in 2025. Is he improving in this regard, or is it time to project him as a reliever (William Shatner In the UnXplained dot GIF)? You’ll find more on Montgomery below. Potential Dude(s) Chen-Wei Lin, RHP, St. Louis Cardinals Lin, 23, was a notable Taiwanese college pitcher who gained stateside exposure via the Northwoods and MLB Draft Leagues before he signed with the Cardinals for $500,000 in 2023. He’s a sky-scraping 6-foot-7 righty who’ll touch 100 and has a great splitter, but his strike throwing really backed up this year. He has mid-rotation stuff and is a feasible late bloomer as a strike-thrower because of his size. Surface-Level Statistical Performers Venezuelan Blue Jays righty Yondrei Rojas, 22, missed nearly three months with injury this year, but he posted a 0.88 WHIP and 1.43 ERA in the 37.2 innings he threw, and wrapped his season at Double-A New Hampshire. His fastball sits about 96, and Rojas’ super long arms help him generate six-and-a-half feet of extension even though he’s only 5-foot-10. His slider isn’t great, and he needs a good second pitch. Whether one can be developed here might dictate whether he ends up rostered by Toronto this winter. Braden Montgomery led all AFL hitters in regular season doubles with 34. Blue Jays infielder Cutter Coffey slashed .273/.359/.427 during the year, while White Sox 1B/OF Caden Connor (6%) and Cardinals outfielder Travis Honeyman (7%) had low swinging strike rates. White Sox infielder Sam Antonacci had nearly as many walks as strikeouts and a 155 wRC+ in a season split between High- and Double-A; he also stole 48 bases. Braves outfielder Patrick Clohisy stole 79 bases this year, 20 more than any other Fall Leaguer. TrackMan Performer Braves infielder Jim Jarvis has a notable contact (80%, above average) and power (40% hard-hit, just below average) combo. Atlanta right-hander LJ McDonough is generating seven feet of extension and also has a release height just under five feet, and I’m really excited for an in-person peek at what his delivery looks like from the side. Key Roster Situation The promotion pace of hard-throwing Cardinals righty Randel Clemente was accelerated this season, as he climbed three levels to Double-A in his 40-man platform year. He has huge stuff, loud enough that he might be of interest to teams in the Rule 5 Draft if he shoves for six weeks and is left unprotected, but he struggles with command to the point where he may not stick on a roster even if he’s taken. Blue Jays infielder Josh Kasevich, one of the better pure contact hitters in the minors, is looking to rebound after a bad season and put himself in the Blue Jays infield mix for next year in the event Bo Bichette moves on in free agency. Unique Path Braden Montgomery, a White Sox Top 100 prospect, was arguably the top unsigned high school prospect from his graduating class. He was an exciting two-way player at Stanford who eventually transferred to Texas A&M, where he focused on hitting and cut his strikeouts enough to solidify his early-first round status. He became Boston’s first round pick, then was quickly a key aspect of the Garrett Crochet trade. He’s a switch-hitting outfielder with plus power and a show-stopping arm, but Montgomery strikes out a lot, and I hope to use the next six weeks to better understand whether this issue will worsen against big league velocity. Mesa Solar Sox (Athletics, Cubs, Marlins, Yankees, Rays) Famous Players PJ Morlando, OF, Miami Marlins Brailer Guerrero, OF, Tampa Bay Rays Aidan Smith, OF, Tampa Bay Rays Morlando had the best present power among the high schoolers in the 2024 draft, absurd BP pop for a hitter his age that allowed him to make big league parks look small with a wood bat. He signed for $3.4 million rather than go to South Carolina, and so far his pro career has been beset by injuries. A stress reaction in his back ended his short pro debut in 2024, then Morlando needed ulnar nerve transposition surgery in the spring of 2025 before straining his hamstring in May. Let’s see how he looks the further he gets away from those injuries. Both of the Rays outfielders have either been on my Top 100 (in Guerrero’s case) or on others’ in the past. Both have big tools (Guerrero is built like an NFL prospect and has big power, while Smith is sinewy and long-levered with plus speed and long-term power projection), but their swings are so long that I’m worried both are going to strike out a ton. You could just as easily include them in the next group. Potential Dude(s) Karson Milbrandt, RHP, Miami Marlins Bryce Cunningham, RHP, New York Yankees Milbrandt signed for just shy of $1.5 million in the 2022 third round rather than head to Vanderbilt. His development hasn’t been linear, but the now-21-year-old set a career best for innings (90) and K% (29%) this year and reached Double-A. Do his mechanics and feel for location look starter-y? Cunningham was the Yankees’ second rounder in 2024 but failed to exceed his junior year innings total this season due to injury. His changeup played like a plus-plus pitch this year. Does he have enough of a breaking ball to be considered a mid-rotation starter prospect? Surface-Level Statistical Performers Infield prospect Joshua Kuroda-Grauer, 22, was the Athletics’ 2024 third rounder out of Rutgers and K’d just 9% of the time this year. Assessing his potential defensive versatility will be key this Fall League, as he may not have the power to profile as an everyday second baseman. Cubs catcher Owen Ayers, a 24-year-old out of Marshall, has among both the highest pull rates (55%) and lowest groundball rates (37%) in the AFL. Yankees righty Hueston Morrill had a 0.76 ERA on the season. TrackMan Performers Rays righty Jadon Bercovich has a fastball with nearly 19 inches of induced vertical break and it’s coming from a lower-than-average release point, if only by a little bit. Brailer Guerrero had a 50% hard-hit rate but averaged just two degrees of launch because of the nature of his swing. Marlins outfielder Fenwick Trimble hovered around the big league average in both contact rate and his power metrics. Key Roster Situation Athletics infielder Max Muncy was added to the roster on Opening Day. With Jacob Wilson slated to handle everyday shortstop duties for the A’s, Muncy is slated to compete with Darell Hernaiz and Brett Harris for playing time at second and third base. The industry will be watching him this fall with that in mind. He’s on the mend from a hand injury and might not have his typical power just yet. Unique Path Rays righty Mason Auer was a two-way prospect who had a nomadic amateur career (Missouri State, San Jacinto) and became a 40+ FV prospect as an outfielder after a breakout 2022 season. The following year he really started to struggle making any kind of contact, and toward the end of 2024, the Rays moved him back to the mound. He threw just shy of six innings this year, a pitch sample so small that it doesn’t meet the minimum threshold for inclusion on the TrackMan data I pulled to prep. This guy is a black box for me right now. I put a 70 on his outfield arm in high school and want to see how he looks airing it out an inning at a time as a reliever. Peoria Javelinas (Orioles, Reds, Twins, Padres, Mariners) Famous Players Rhett Lowder, RHP, Cincinnati Reds Alfredo Duno, C, Cincinnati Reds Enrique Bradfield Jr., Baltimore Orioles Jonny Farmelo, OF, Seattle Mariners Lowder, the seventh overall pick in 2023, is picking up innings after missing time with forearm and oblique strains this season. Duno is a toolshed teenage catcher who is coming off a great Low-A season during which he was finally healthy and productive. The Reds didn’t promote him to High-A toward the end of the year, so this is a de facto promotion and will be a test of Duno’s plate discipline. Bradfield is a classic leadoff hitting center field prospect who became a household name during his days at Vanderbilt. With Cedric Mullins gone, could he compete for time in center field next year? Farmelo is only 21 and is quite young for this league both in terms of his age and minor league experience, as injuries have limited him to 75 games since he was drafted in 2023. He has a rare combination of power and speed, but his bat-to-ball ability has been tough to nail down because he’s missed so much time. Are his struggles with strikeouts actually a talent issue, or are they a small sample anomaly or perhaps the result of yet unshaken rust? Potential Dude(s) Brandon Winokur, UTIL, Minnesota Twins Cam Collier, 3B, Cincinnati Reds Luis De León, LHP, Baltimore Orioles Winokur is a 6-foot-6, 20-year-old shortstop and center fielder who hit 17 bombs this year. He still hasn’t totally grown into his body, and should add both strength and coordination as he matures. Hopefully with that will come fewer strikeouts. His K% has slowly been trending down each season. He’s a long-term project with big ceiling. Collier signed for $5 million in 2022 and has special lefty raw power, but it hasn’t been actualized in games and he hit just four dingers this year even though his underlying TrackMan power data (115 mph max, 48% hard-hit rate) are excellent. De León is a high-ceiling’d 22-year-old lefty with a very projectable 6-foot-3 frame who was sitting in the 95-97 mph range during the spring of 2025 before he was shut down at the start of the season with an elbow impingement. His fastball has uphill angle and tail, but De León has very little feel for locating it or his plus-plus slider. Though he has a ton of relief risk, in part because his arm stroke is so long, the way De León is built and moves is indicative of a starting pitcher. He has the ceiling of a mid-rotation arm with rare lefty starter velo and two plus secondaries, while his floor looks like Génesis Cabrera. Surface-Level Statistical Performers Alfredo Duno had a 164 wRC+ on the season and hit .287/.430/.518 with 52 extra-base hits. Billy Amick, the Twins’ 2024 second rounder, had a 150 wRC+ and hit .307 in 54 games at Cedar Rapids. Outfielder Hendry Mendez (traded from Milwaukee to Philly, then later to Minnesota) posted a 5.9% swinging strike rate this year, among the best of all Fall Leaguers. Orioles pitcher Tanner Smith generated a ridiculous 67% groundball rate in 37 innings. TrackMan Performers Cam Collier hit a ball 115 this year and had a 48% hard-hit rate even though he only hit four homers; continuing to understand what’s going on there and how it might get fixed is a big deal. Hendry Mendez had a 91% zone contact rate this season. Righty Johan Moreno’s slider generated a 52% miss rate. Key Roster Situation The Mariners have a host of pitchers on the 40-man fringe here. Marcelo Perez is a strike-throwing 25-year-old out of TCU whose curveball and cutter spearhead a backend starter profile. Stefan Raeth is a deceptive, slider-heavy reliever who throws a ton of strikes. Tyler Cleveland is a funky, submarine relief righty with a big sweeper. Any of them could move the needle with a dominant fall. Unique Path Orioles lefty Sayer Diederich began his college career as a pitcher at Nebraska, then became a two-way guy at Southern Nevada for a season before transferring to LSU Shreveport (NAIA) for his final collegiate season. He went undrafted and played Indy ball for a year before the Orioles signed him. He’s 24 but only made his affiliated debut this year, striking out 43 in 33.2 innings thanks to a good slider. Salt River Rafters (D-backs, Red Sox, Rockies, Angels, Pirates) Famous Players Charlie Condon, 3B/OF, Colorado Rockies Condon had one of the best college seasons ever in 2024 and was the third overall pick in that draft, signing for over $9 million. I was somewhat skeptical of Condon’s bat-to-ball ability before the draft and he struggled so badly immediately after he signed that he slid out of my Top 100. That fallow period was explained away due to injury, and while Condon was much better in 2025, he still K’d at a 28% clip at Double-A, and I still think he has a volatile offensive forecast even though he clearly has big power. Potential Dude(s) Tony Blanco Jr., 1B, Pittsburgh Pirates Jansel Luis, SS, Arizona Diamondbacks David Hagaman, RHP, Arizona Diamondbacks Blanco has some of the best raw power in all of pro baseball even though he’s only 20 years old. He’s already hit a ball 120 mph and had a 113 mph EV90 in 2025, second in pro baseball behind Oneil Cruz. Will he be Aaron Judge? Chris Carter? Or will Blanco make so little contact that he turns into a Franmil Reyes type of fringe big leaguer? Luis is a projectable switch-hitting 20-year-old infielder with awesome hand speed, but his Epicurean approach at the dish has tended to impact his production. Hagaman came to Arizona in the Merrill Kelly trade. He fell in his draft year due to TJ and only returned to affiliated ball a few weeks before he was traded. He is both built like and moves like a big league starter, will flash three good pitches, and threw strikes in a relatively small sample after he was back from surgery. Surface-Level Statistical Performers Angels righty Benny Thompson, an undrafted free agent from 2023, had a ridiculous 39% K% in 61.1 innings this year. Granted, he’s an older guy who spent the year in A-ball and he walked a ton of dudes. To my recollection, I’ve never seen Thompson, so I have no idea how he’s doing this. His age and wildness make him a lower-priority target, but a target nonetheless. Angels outfielder Raudi Rodriguez had an amazing 14 triples in 125 games and stole 38 bases in 44 attempts. Pirates outfielder Esmerlyn Valdez hit 26 homers this year, most among Fall Leaguers. TrackMan Performers Angels righty Najer Victor had a 60% miss rate on his slider this year, while the sliders of Ryan Costeiu, another Angels reliever, and D-backs rehabber Drey Jameson had slider miss rates just shy of 50%. Salt River doesn’t have anyone on the roster with a contact rate over 76%, a mark owned by Jansel Luis. And of course, I mentioned Tony Blanco Jr. Key Roster Situation Drey Jameson, a former Top 100 prospect, graduated from rookie status in 2023, but his career has been beset by injuries since then. The vacuum created by injuries to Corbin Burnes, A.J. Puk and Justin Martinez, plus the looming potential turnover in Arizona’s rotation due to Zac Gallen’s free agency, makes it particularly important for Jameson to hit the ground running and play a key role on the pitching staff of an otherwise competitive D-backs roster. His look in Arizona will help determine what kind of role — Starter? Long reliever? Late-inning guy? — he might compete for when camp kicks off next spring. Red Sox righty Luis Perales is in a similar situation after returning from surgery late in the year. He might be a big part of Boston’s 2026 bullpen. Unique Path Pirates outfielder Will Taylor comes from a family of decorated athletes in South Carolina and has one of the nuttier high school athletics résumés you’ll ever see. He lettered five times in baseball, five times in track & field, four times in football and four times in wrestling, he was a three-time state champion in wrestling, and he won state titles in football and track. He went to Clemson as a two-sport athlete and became the first football and baseball player at the university since Lions defensive lineman D.J. Reader, but he tore his ACL in 2021 and had just one productive baseball season. He was drafted in the 2024 fifth round and had a big power output uptick in 2025. Scottsdale Scorpions (Tigers, Astros, Mets, Giants, Nationals) Famous Players Kevin McGonigle, 2B, Detroit Tigers You’re no doubt familiar with McGonigle, who is one of the very best prospects in baseball thanks to his elite feel for contact. A great Fall League would tee him up to replace Gleyber Torres as the Tigers’ everyday second baseman next year should Torres leave in free agency. Potential Dudes Jake Bennett, LHP, Washington Nationals Walker Janek, C, Houston Astros Bennett is a 6-foot-6, 24-year-old lefty who throws a ton of strikes and has a great changeup. He doesn’t throw especially hard, but lefties with great command of great changeups tend to outperform their projections. We could see Bennett in the bigs next year. Janek is a super athletic catcher with rare pull power for his position. He strikes out a good bit, but he’s a small school player from Sam Houston State who might just need more time to adjust to pro pitching. Surface-Level Statistical Performers Sean Paul Liñan, a 20-year-old righty who came over from the Dodgers in the Alex Call trade, is not only one of the youngest couple of pitchers in the league, but he K’d 33% of opposing hitters this year, second most among AFL pitchers who threw at least 70 innings during the season. TrackMan Performers Kevin McGonigle checks every box in at least an average capacity. Astros outfielder Joseph Sullivan had a microscopic 13% chase rate. Sean Paul Liñan’s changeup features 2,600 rpm and generated an elite miss rate this year. Tigers pitcher Kenny Serwa has a splitter with a triple-digit spin rate. Key Roster Situation Tigers lefty Jake Miller looked great in last year’s Fall League, but he spent most of 2025 on the IL and only threw 20 innings. The Tigers’ big league roster is absolutely stacked with good pitching, and it might crowd out Miller to the point where he generates trade or Rule 5 Draft interest this offseason. Unique Path Giants infielder Parks Harber began his college career at Georgia, then transferred to North Carolina and was eventually an undrafted senior sign by the Yankees in 2024. He was off to a hot start in 2025, then got injured a few weeks before he was traded to the Giants as part of the Camilo Doval deal. He hit .323 this year in limited action and has the overt physicality of a big league 3B/1B, but how real is the hit tool? Surprise Saguaros (Guardians, Royals, Brewers, Phillies, Rangers) Famous Players Daniel Espino, RHP, Cleveland Guardians Blake Mitchell, C, Kansas City Royals Sebastian Walcott, SS, Texas Rangers Espino looked like the next Gerrit Cole before multiple full-season injuries derailed his career. He’s been back for a bit, and touched 102 on the backfields before he was briefly sent to an affiliate during the regular season. He looks a lot like Ryan Helsley now; let’s see how he and his stuff hold up (or maybe progress) through the fall. Mitchell has been famous since he was a high school sophomore, a lefty-hitting catcher prospect with big power and arm strength. Poor plate discipline threatens to turn him into a lefty-hitting Jorge Alfaro, useful but flawed. Walcott has maybe the best long-term power projection in the minors. He’s a strapping 6-foot-4 and has performed as a young-for-the-level player with each assignment. Potential Dudes Josh Adamczewski, 2B/LF, Milwaukee Brewers Dylan Dreiling, OF, Texas Rangers Adamczewski has plus lefty bat speed but really struggles on defense. It’s plausible he’ll hit enough to be a good left fielder, a position where he saw increased reps during Instructional League and likely will again in the AFL. The Rangers have totally overhauled Dreiling’s swing. His angle of attack has changed — his bat is pointed more vertically when his hands load — and he’s been given a bigger leg kick. He made a plus rate of contact in 2025, and this fall will be used to determine how well he can time fastballs. Surface-Level Statistical Performers Phillies prospect Dante Nori (52) and Royals prospect Carson Roccaforte (43) were near the top of the stolen base leaderboard across all of the minors. Brewers 1B/3B Luke Adams has a career .423 OBP in four seasons. Royals right-hander A.J. Causey had a 0.88 WHIP and 1.72 ERA this year. TrackMan Performers Guardians outfielder Wuilfredo Antunez doesn’t have big top-end power, but he’s averaging an absolutely wild 23 degrees of launch, which might be too extreme for him to be productive. Marco Dinges (who you’ll read about shortly) is pacing this group with a 107 mph EV90. Rangers pitcher Joey Danielson generated an absurd 42% miss rate on his 95-96 mph fastball. Key Roster Situation The Rangers have three pitchers in Arizona who could conceivably play key roles on next year’s big league team. Winston Santos is an athletic, strike-throwing 23-year-old righty with a 94-97 mph fastball. He missed time in 2025 with a stress reaction in his back. I wrote about Jose Corniell in August. And finally, righty Emiliano Teodo will exceed triple digits with his fastball, but its shape and movement aren’t conducive to missing bats. Unique Path Marco Dinges began his college career at Tallahassee Community College where, during his sophomore year, he developed Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis, a potentially fatal autoimmune disease where white blood cells are produced in excess and attack healthy tissues and organs rather than an actual invader, like a virus. For weeks, Dinges had a fever of 105 or so and was literally fighting for his life, in and out of different hospitals before he was properly diagnosed and treated by a pediatric rheumatologist and professor at the University of Florida. Ironically, after Dinges recovered and was ready to resume his baseball career, he transferred to Florida State for his junior year. He’s a really toolsy (bat speed, arm strength) if undersized catcher coming off a year with an OPS over .900. Arizona Fall League Hitters’ Contact Data Player Pos Age Org AFL ContactRate InZoneMiss Chase 2K Chase Nacho Alvarez Jr. 3B 22 ATL Glendale 78% 17% 25% 40% Patrick Clohisy CF 23 ATL Glendale 74% 16% 28% 34% Jim Jarvis SS 24 ATL Glendale 81% 15% 24% 38% Sam Antonacci 2B 22 CWS Glendale 86% 11% 17% 34% Ryan Galanie 1B 25 CWS Glendale 76% 17% 23% 28% Caden Connor LF 25 CWS Glendale 85% 10% 26% 39% Braden Montgomery CF 22 CWS Glendale 67% 23% 24% 34% Josue De Paula LF 20 LAD Glendale 76% 20% 14% 23% Logan Wagner 3B 21 LAD Glendale 67% 25% 23% 29% Nico Perez 2B 21 LAD Glendale 76% 17% 28% 35% Graysen Tarlow C 24 STL Glendale 77% 19% 20% 42% Travis Honeyman CF 23 STL Glendale 81% 15% 24% 39% Miguel Ugueto RF 23 STL Glendale 78% 12% 40% 58% Cutter Coffey 3B 21 TOR Glendale 72% 23% 25% 35% Edward Duran C 21 TOR Glendale 75% 18% 27% 42% Josh Kasevich SS 24 TOR Glendale 85% 12% 19% 33% Joshua Kuroda-Grauer SS 22 ATH Mesa 86% 7% 29% 58% Ryan Lasko CF 23 ATH Mesa 66% 24% 23% 29% Tommy White 3B 22 ATH Mesa 80% 14% 34% 50% Cole Mathis DH 22 CHC Mesa 76% 19% 20% 32% Ed Howard SS 23 CHC Mesa 54% 31% 33% 39% Owen Ayers C 24 CHC Mesa 72% 20% 22% 29% Fenwick Trimble CF 23 MIA Mesa 76% 17% 21% 37% Starlyn Caba SS 19 MIA Mesa 84% 12% 19% 36% PJ Morlando LF 20 MIA Mesa 69% 22% 21% 35% Enmanuel Tejeda 2B 20 NYY Mesa 79% 16% 21% 29% Manuel Palencia C 23 NYY Mesa 79% 16% 30% 56% Coby Morales 1B 23 NYY Mesa 71% 23% 27% 42% Aidan Smith CF 21 TB Mesa 67% 25% 25% 37% Brailer Guerrero RF 19 TB Mesa 64% 25% 27% 27% Brayden Taylor 3B 23 TB Mesa 72% 21% 19% 26% Thomas Sosa RF 20 BAL Peoria 70% 25% 29% 37% Enrique Bradfield Jr. CF 23 BAL Peoria 79% 16% 17% 25% Ethan Anderson C 22 BAL Peoria 80% 16% 21% 37% Alfredo Duno C 19 CIN Peoria 69% 26% 15% 19% Cam Collier 1B 20 CIN Peoria 71% 21% 23% 33% Leo Balcazar SS 21 CIN Peoria 79% 14% 28% 39% Billy Amick 1B 22 MIN Peoria 68% 24% 23% 29% Hendry Mendez LF 21 MIN Peoria 85% 9% 19% 26% Brandon Winokur CF 20 MIN Peoria 66% 26% 34% 36% Ryan Jackson SS 23 SD Peoria 77% 16% 21% 37% Braedon Karpathios RF 22 SD Peoria 71% 25% 19% 24% Lamar King Jr. C 21 SD Peoria 74% 16% 27% 33% Charlie Pagliarini 2B 24 SEA Peoria 67% 25% 23% 31% Jonny Farmelo CF 21 SEA Peoria 65% 26% 21% 33% Brock Rodden SS 25 SEA Peoria 69% 20% 28% 50% Jansel Luis 2B 20 AZ Salt River 76% 15% 34% 47% Kenny Castillo C 21 AZ Salt River 75% 18% 36% 41% Jack Hurley CF 23 AZ Salt River 58% 35% 33% 42% Johanfran Garcia C 20 BOS Salt River 65% 26% 33% 40% Nelly Taylor CF 22 BOS Salt River 67% 25% 18% 33% Charlie Condon 1B 22 COL Salt River 69% 21% 23% 27% Jared Thomas LF 22 COL Salt River 69% 22% 25% 40% Braylen Wimmer LF 24 COL Salt River 73% 18% 32% 42% Raudi Rodriguez RF 22 LAA Salt River 68% 24% 27% 34% David Mershon SS 22 LAA Salt River 70% 23% 20% 24% Juan Flores C 19 LAA Salt River 66% 21% 38% 43% Esmerlyn Valdez RF 21 PIT Salt River 70% 24% 21% 30% Tony Blanco Jr. DH 20 PIT Salt River 56% 34% 33% 44% Will Taylor CF 22 PIT Salt River 66% 26% 20% 26% Kevin McGonigle SS 21 DET Scottsdale 81% 14% 20% 34% Max Anderson 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 76% 18% 31% 42% Jack Penney 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 76% 16% 17% 27% Joseph Sullivan CF 23 HOU Scottsdale 72% 20% 13% 22% Walker Janek C 23 HOU Scottsdale 68% 23% 31% 42% Jeron Williams SS 24 HOU Scottsdale 80% 11% 32% 35% Chris Suero C 21 NYM Scottsdale 68% 25% 24% 31% D’Andre Smith RF 24 NYM Scottsdale 77% 15% 33% 48% Nick Morabito CF 22 NYM Scottsdale 77% 18% 24% 33% Axiel Plaz C 20 PIT Scottsdale 72% 19% 36% 49% Parks Harber 3B 23 SF Scottsdale 72% 17% 23% 34% Walker Martin 3B 21 SF Scottsdale 64% 26% 22% 33% Maui Ahuna SS 23 SF Scottsdale 66% 23% 24% 34% Sam Petersen CF 22 WSH Scottsdale 69% 27% 25% 25% Ethan Petry LF 21 WSH Scottsdale 64% 30% 23% 33% Seaver King SS 22 WSH Scottsdale 77% 17% 37% 54% Wuilfredo Antunez RF 23 CLE Surprise 74% 20% 31% 44% Juan Benjamin 3B 22 CLE Surprise 77% 14% 27% 42% Joe Lampe LF 24 CLE Surprise 76% 18% 24% 33% Carson Roccaforte CF 23 KC Surprise 67% 25% 19% 30% Blake Mitchell C 21 KC Surprise 64% 31% 18% 25% Daniel Vazquez SS 21 KC Surprise 72% 17% 28% 35% Luke Adams 1B 21 MIL Surprise 77% 17% 15% 28% Marco Dinges C 22 MIL Surprise 71% 21% 24% 36% Josh Adamczewski 2B 20 MIL Surprise 73% 19% 22% 30% Aidan Miller SS 21 PHI Surprise 76% 17% 17% 27% Dante Nori CF 20 PHI Surprise 80% 13% 24% 29% Carson DeMartini 3B 22 PHI Surprise 67% 24% 23% 32% Sebastian Walcott SS 19 TEX Surprise 72% 19% 25% 36% Malcolm Moore C 22 TEX Surprise 74% 16% 26% 38% Ben Hartl C 22 TEX Surprise 74% 20% 21% 29% Dylan Dreiling CF 22 TEX Surprise 83% 12% 24% 40% Arizona Fall League Hitters’ Power Data Player Pos Age Org AFL EV90 MaxEV HardHit AvgLaunch Nacho Alvarez Jr. 3B 22 ATL Glendale 101.3 108.2 27% 17 Patrick Clohisy CF 23 ATL Glendale 102.2 111.0 30% 11 Jim Jarvis SS 24 ATL Glendale 104.7 110.0 40% 9 Sam Antonacci 2B 22 CWS Glendale 102.7 109.8 39% 11 Ryan Galanie 1B 25 CWS Glendale 102.6 113.4 42% 14 Caden Connor LF 25 CWS Glendale 102.4 109.1 37% 6 Braden Montgomery CF 22 CWS Glendale 106.8 111.4 47% 7 Josue De Paula LF 20 LAD Glendale 105.3 111.9 42% 12 Logan Wagner 3B 21 LAD Glendale 104.2 110.3 41% 17 Nico Perez 2B 21 LAD Glendale 103.1 108.8 33% 18 Graysen Tarlow C 24 STL Glendale 99.0 103.2 31% 9 Travis Honeyman CF 23 STL Glendale 100.9 108.6 27% 9 Miguel Ugueto RF 23 STL Glendale 103.6 108.8 36% 2 Cutter Coffey 3B 21 TOR Glendale 102.1 113.7 38% 13 Edward Duran C 21 TOR Glendale 101.7 109.1 37% 7 Josh Kasevich SS 24 TOR Glendale 100.2 109.5 40% 16 Joshua Kuroda-Grauer SS 22 ATH Mesa 100.3 113.3 28% 6 Ryan Lasko CF 23 ATH Mesa 102.9 111.1 38% 10 Tommy White 3B 22 ATH Mesa 103.3 114.1 35% 9 Cole Mathis DH 22 CHC Mesa 102.7 108.7 33% 21 Ed Howard SS 23 CHC Mesa 103.6 105.0 41% 9 Owen Ayers C 24 CHC Mesa 104.5 113.3 44% 15 Fenwick Trimble CF 23 MIA Mesa 104.3 109.6 41% 8 Starlyn Caba SS 19 MIA Mesa 98.4 104.8 30% 9 PJ Morlando LF 20 MIA Mesa 102.2 109.0 28% 8 Enmanuel Tejeda 2B 20 NYY Mesa 100.6 110.0 37% 10 Manuel Palencia C 23 NYY Mesa 102.0 111.0 37% 9 Coby Morales 1B 23 NYY Mesa 103.8 111.2 45% 11 Aidan Smith CF 21 TB Mesa 104.1 111.7 39% 16 Brailer Guerrero RF 19 TB Mesa 108.8 115.9 50% 2 Brayden Taylor 3B 23 TB Mesa 101.7 112.8 39% 25 Thomas Sosa RF 20 BAL Peoria 106.7 111.8 41% 14 Enrique Bradfield Jr. CF 23 BAL Peoria 101.2 108.0 32% 14 Ethan Anderson C 22 BAL Peoria 102.9 109.1 38% 13 Alfredo Duno C 19 CIN Peoria 105.5 123.9 48% 14 Cam Collier 1B 20 CIN Peoria 105.6 115.2 48% 8 Leo Balcazar SS 21 CIN Peoria 102.5 113.6 37% 11 Billy Amick 1B 22 MIN Peoria 103.9 111.6 41% 14 Hendry Mendez LF 21 MIN Peoria 104.8 113.0 42% 3 Brandon Winokur CF 20 MIN Peoria 106.0 113.5 41% 10 Ryan Jackson SS 23 SD Peoria 100.8 110.3 32% 10 Braedon Karpathios RF 22 SD Peoria 105.6 111.3 52% 9 Lamar King Jr. C 21 SD Peoria 103.0 109.9 41% 13 Charlie Pagliarini 2B 24 SEA Peoria 108.1 125.9 43% 14 Jonny Farmelo CF 21 SEA Peoria 103.6 108.6 28% 15 Brock Rodden SS 25 SEA Peoria 104.5 110.6 41% 19 Jansel Luis 2B 20 AZ Salt River 101.1 111.5 27% 8 Kenny Castillo C 21 AZ Salt River 103.3 109.0 35% 16 Jack Hurley CF 23 AZ Salt River 105.0 111.4 42% 9 Johanfran Garcia C 20 BOS Salt River 104.3 109.4 41% 20 Nelly Taylor CF 22 BOS Salt River 105.4 111.9 48% 18 Charlie Condon 1B 22 COL Salt River 105.7 112.1 44% 14 Jared Thomas LF 22 COL Salt River 104.6 109.9 48% 14 Braylen Wimmer LF 24 COL Salt River 103.8 128.9 38% 9 Raudi Rodriguez RF 22 LAA Salt River 106.6 111.8 45% 9 David Mershon SS 22 LAA Salt River 99.1 109.0 28% 7 Juan Flores C 19 LAA Salt River 102.9 112.9 34% 19 Esmerlyn Valdez RF 21 PIT Salt River 107.8 115.2 45% 16 Tony Blanco Jr. DH 20 PIT Salt River 113.5 119.8 54% 10 Will Taylor CF 22 PIT Salt River 103.5 108.2 40% 18 Kevin McGonigle SS 21 DET Scottsdale 105.3 113.3 47% 19 Max Anderson 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 104.7 111.3 47% 10 Jack Penney 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 104.5 110.2 45% 8 Joseph Sullivan CF 23 HOU Scottsdale 106.9 111.6 50% 10 Walker Janek C 23 HOU Scottsdale 104.4 111.6 36% 17 Jeron Williams SS 24 HOU Scottsdale 101.1 109.5 33% 7 Chris Suero C 21 NYM Scottsdale 105.4 112.7 42% 14 D’Andre Smith RF 24 NYM Scottsdale 103.5 110.6 40% 10 Nick Morabito CF 22 NYM Scottsdale 103.2 110.2 38% 4 Axiel Plaz C 20 PIT Scottsdale 108.0 113.9 53% 8 Parks Harber 3B 23 SF Scottsdale 107.7 112.4 56% 11 Walker Martin 3B 21 SF Scottsdale 106.7 114.2 48% 13 Maui Ahuna SS 23 SF Scottsdale 105.2 113.7 49% 4 Sam Petersen CF 22 WSH Scottsdale 103.3 110.1 44% 13 Ethan Petry LF 21 WSH Scottsdale 107.1 111.0 47% 2 Seaver King SS 22 WSH Scottsdale 104.8 110.9 40% 6 Wuilfredo Antunez RF 23 CLE Surprise 102.0 113.8 33% 23 Juan Benjamin 3B 22 CLE Surprise 100.6 110.1 29% 10 Joe Lampe LF 24 CLE Surprise 103.3 109.6 36% 10 Carson Roccaforte CF 23 KC Surprise 103.6 110.1 43% 18 Blake Mitchell C 21 KC Surprise 104.3 109.1 41% 16 Daniel Vazquez SS 21 KC Surprise 101.7 111.1 31% 9 Luke Adams 1B 21 MIL Surprise 104.2 109.9 34% 17 Marco Dinges C 22 MIL Surprise 107.2 111.5 48% 13 Josh Adamczewski 2B 20 MIL Surprise 103.9 110.5 39% 14 Aidan Miller SS 21 PHI Surprise 106.3 114.5 43% 14 Dante Nori CF 20 PHI Surprise 101.0 109.2 32% 11 Carson DeMartini 3B 22 PHI Surprise 104.2 111.4 42% 21 Sebastian Walcott SS 19 TEX Surprise 106.8 113.3 40% 8 Malcolm Moore C 22 TEX Surprise 101.2 110.7 27% 19 Ben Hartl C 22 TEX Surprise 100.4 105.9 31% 12 Dylan Dreiling CF 22 TEX Surprise 103.9 111.2 40% 16 Arizona Fall League Pitchers’ Movement Data Pitcher Org Arm FV Pitch Avg IVB Horiz Miss Chase Cory Wall ATL R Glendale 4SM 92.6 18.8 8.5 24% 25% Cory Wall ATL R Glendale SL 83.7 1.6 -1.4 32% 36% Cory Wall ATL R Glendale CH 81.0 3.4 12.8 41% 31% LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 4SM 95.0 15.8 8.1 27% 17% LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 2SM 95.0 14.0 11.9 39% 29% LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale CT 88.4 2.9 -4.3 31% 32% LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale SL 87.5 1.1 -4.8 43% 42% Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale 4SM 93.4 18.0 8.6 30% 22% Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale CT 88.4 5.3 0.1 35% 30% Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale SL 84.1 5.3 1.3 36% 32% Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale 2SM 93.5 13.6 13.6 32% 24% Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale CT 86.4 6.3 0.2 31% 13% Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale SL 84.7 5.0 0.6 27% 29% Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale CH 84.8 5.4 8.6 33% 36% Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale 4SM 95.6 20.1 5.0 32% 26% Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale CT 88.4 6.7 -2.5 52% 29% Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale SL 87.4 4.6 -3.4 55% 23% Connor McCullough CWS R Glendale 2SM 90.9 9.1 14.4 25% 27% Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 4SM 93.9 16.0 -10.6 43% 16% Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 2SM 93.8 15.2 -12.0 27% 18% Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale SL 81.7 -2.2 4.9 48% 28% Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 4SM 92.9 18.5 10.0 22% 35% Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 2SM 93.1 16.6 14.5 26% 35% Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale CB/SLV 78.9 -5.5 -8.7 42% 40% Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale CH 83.7 8.0 13.4 41% 17% Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale 4SM 94.9 18.9 9.0 29% 24% Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale SL 84.1 -0.6 -8.1 23% 25% Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale CH 84.2 4.8 14.3 46% 22% Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale 4SM 97.0 19.1 8.4 45% 17% Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale CT 90.4 5.3 -4.1 39% 21% Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale SL 87.6 -5.8 -6.6 63% 38% Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 84.6 -14.6 -11.1 48% 30% Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 4SM 94.1 18.0 5.2 21% 18% Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 2SM 89.9 10.7 17.5 57% 25% Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale SL 87.9 2.0 -3.4 46% 28% Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 78.2 -22.1 -5.2 86% 14% Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 4SM 94.7 14.2 -7.7 25% 28% Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 2SM 92.8 6.1 -14.5 12% 18% Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale SWP 85.4 -1.2 14.2 53% 42% Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale 2SM 92.7 5.9 -15.8 34% 30% Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale SWP 79.0 -5.7 14.7 79% 42% Payton Martin LAD R Glendale 4SM 94.1 17.5 5.9 16% 18% Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CT 88.2 6.2 -2.9 36% 33% Payton Martin LAD R Glendale SL 84.3 2.1 -7.0 40% 48% Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 80.1 -5.9 -10.7 42% 34% Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CH 86.7 6.6 12.1 43% 20% D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale 4SM 94.9 18.3 4.9 12% 14% D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale CT 87.0 2.8 -8.7 52% 68% D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale SL 86.2 1.0 -8.8 34% 25% Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 4SM 92.6 15.4 8.5 17% 15% Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 2SM 92.3 12.1 13.5 9% 32% Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale SL 81.9 0.5 0.2 41% 32% Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale CB/SLV 79.8 -7.0 -1.6 37% 33% Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale CH 85.6 4.5 14.6 36% 22% Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 4SM 96.0 17.9 11.2 21% 26% Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 2SM 96.2 16.1 14.1 22% 17% Randel Clemente STL R Glendale CT 87.6 1.0 0.0 54% 32% Randel Clemente STL R Glendale SL 86.6 -0.4 -0.5 70% 46% Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 4SM 95.4 17.3 11.2 30% 18% Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 2SM 94.1 13.2 13.9 25% 14% Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale SL 85.4 -2.9 -7.8 42% 33% Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale CB/SLV 84.4 -7.6 -8.8 30% 21% Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale 4SM 93.7 19.6 8.1 33% 25% Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale CT 86.7 6.0 -2.6 31% 28% Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale SL 85.5 3.8 -3.6 46% 23% Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale CB/SLV 77.3 -13.3 -9.9 24% 8% Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale 4SM 96.5 18.8 6.0 32% 28% Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale CT 91.1 5.6 -1.7 55% 39% Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale SL 89.7 2.2 -2.4 39% 33% Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale 2SM 92.0 12.0 -17.8 28% 29% Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale SL 83.4 1.8 0.7 26% 22% Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 4SM 95.9 14.7 6.7 33% 18% Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 2SM 93.9 8.4 15.6 27% 29% Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale SL 86.9 4.4 -5.4 26% 32% Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 4SM 93.0 17.9 7.7 13% 22% Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 2SM 92.0 13.3 15.1 26% 6% Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa SL 85.9 1.1 -2.2 35% 38% Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa CH 84.6 4.3 11.9 15% 27% Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 4SM 94.7 18.7 10.0 21% 27% Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 2SM 91.8 10.2 13.6 20% 29% Corey Avant ATH R Mesa SL 85.3 -3.5 -3.5 39% 30% Corey Avant ATH R Mesa CB/SLV 79.6 -13.3 -9.6 40% 19% Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa 4SM 94.7 15.2 7.3 19% 26% Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa CT 89.5 8.6 -2.4 34% 15% Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa SL 83.5 4.8 -10.4 34% 30% Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa 2SM 91.8 9.2 16.4 13% 21% Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa SL 83.0 1.9 -11.9 26% 33% Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa CB/SLV 80.6 -2.2 -15.4 35% 24% Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa CH 84.7 6.5 15.7 31% 21% Will Johnston ATH L Mesa 4SM 91.3 16.4 -6.6 11% 13% Will Johnston ATH L Mesa SL 81.9 0.0 -3.0 58% 33% Will Johnston ATH L Mesa CB/SLV 81.9 -3.6 -1.3 56% 44% Will Johnston ATH L Mesa CH 81.4 5.3 -8.9 47% 33% JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 4SM 97.5 16.0 8.8 37% 17% JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 2SM 97.4 13.4 14.2 28% 21% JP Wheat CHC R Mesa CT 89.0 6.1 -3.4 51% 23% Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 4SM 94.9 16.2 11.5 44% 30% Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 2SM 93.8 10.9 15.6 26% 23% Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa SL 81.9 2.3 -9.3 44% 27% Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 4SM 95.2 14.7 8.3 26% 20% Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 2SM 95.1 13.5 12.2 19% 24% Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa CT 88.2 6.8 -1.4 27% 23% Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa SL 85.9 3.6 -3.7 39% 39% Thomas Mangus CHC R Mesa 4SM 94.9 17.5 6.3 15% 28% Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 4SM 95.9 14.3 9.6 27% 21% Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 2SM 95.9 13.0 12.4 23% 26% Holt Jones MIA R Mesa CT 87.9 4.1 -1.4 48% 25% Holt Jones MIA R Mesa SL 84.2 4.7 -9.6 39% 33% Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 4SM 92.5 12.4 -6.2 17% 22% Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 2SM 92.7 10.2 -13.3 15% 14% Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa SWP 83.4 -2.7 14.7 35% 21% Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa CH 85.6 5.6 -8.1 41% 52% Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 4SM 95.0 17.3 8.4 33% 23% Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 2SM 94.4 14.0 13.1 28% 19% Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa CT 88.2 3.8 -1.3 36% 40% Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa SL 85.3 0.5 -6.0 30% 38% Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa CB/SLV 82.1 -9.3 -6.9 38% 24% Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa 4SM 93.1 14.1 3.3 19% 25% Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa CT 92.0 12.4 -1.0 23% 17% Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa SWP 83.1 -0.8 -17.2 48% 32% Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa CB/SLV 81.6 -7.7 -15.3 27% 23% Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 4SM 94.1 17.5 4.7 26% 24% Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 2SM 88.9 13.4 17.6 33% 33% Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa SL 83.1 -0.9 -5.4 36% 32% Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa CB/SLV 79.7 -8.1 -6.1 36% 22% Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 4SM 93.5 15.1 8.4 22% 21% Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 2SM 93.5 14.0 12.7 25% 25% Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa CT 90.1 7.9 -2.4 24% 25% Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa SL 85.3 5.7 -5.9 56% 50% Andrew Lindsey TB R Mesa 2SM 95.0 5.8 15.3 13% 8% Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 4SM 94.3 17.5 8.6 30% 31% Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 2SM 94.1 15.9 13.5 20% 30% Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CT 88.6 7.3 -1.5 21% 22% Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CB/SLV 79.3 -11.7 -8.6 39% 26% Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CH 86.8 4.3 14.8 39% 29% Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa 4SM 94.2 18.7 8.3 28% 20% Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa SL 83.7 1.3 -7.3 88% 38% Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 4SM 94.7 16.5 7.3 41% 33% Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 2SM 95.0 15.1 13.1 20% 21% Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa CT 88.0 4.6 -3.6 18% 21% Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa SL 85.3 0.0 -5.3 0% 7% Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria 4SM 92.5 18.3 -5.5 31% 26% Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria SL 81.9 -0.9 6.1 44% 43% Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria CH 82.2 5.9 -11.6 50% 31% Luis De León BAL L Peoria 4SM 96.1 13.7 -12.3 7% 5% Luis De León BAL L Peoria 2SM 95.4 11.9 -14.5 15% 22% Luis De León BAL L Peoria SL 84.9 1.2 4.3 45% 35% Luis De León BAL L Peoria CH 87.3 5.9 -15.2 42% 29% Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria 2SM 89.4 9.5 -16.8 25% 36% Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria SL 82.9 0.4 7.0 35% 34% Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria CH 87.4 7.4 -15.1 16% 34% Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria 4SM 94.4 16.0 5.5 15% 12% Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria CT 88.0 4.2 -2.6 35% 12% Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria SL 84.1 -0.8 -7.6 41% 28% Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria CB/SLV 82.2 -5.3 -11.1 32% 24% Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria 2SM 93.0 6.4 16.7 9% 23% Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria SL 85.5 -1.9 -3.6 50% 43% Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria 4SM 94.8 14.6 3.6 16% 19% Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria CT 88.0 0.6 -7.9 24% 25% Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria SL 84.9 -1.9 -10.0 36% 39% Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria CH 86.4 7.3 9.5 50% 58% Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria 4SM 92.7 17.1 7.7 17% 18% Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria CT 86.2 7.4 -3.0 33% 37% Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria SL 84.1 3.6 -4.4 32% 11% Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria CB/SLV 77.2 -7.9 -3.3 27% 16% Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria SPL 83.3 2.4 8.4 50% 27% Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria 4SM 93.6 19.1 8.0 29% 26% Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria SL 84.0 2.3 -1.5 36% 25% Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria CH 80.1 4.7 12.4 63% 36% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria 4SM 91.5 16.6 10.5 3% 17% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria 2SM 91.4 15.0 13.3 15% 22% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria CT 85.9 8.4 -1.4 31% 29% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria SL 84.4 5.1 -1.6 30% 39% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria CB/SLV 77.4 -10.4 -10.5 37% 17% Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria CH 82.5 3.6 10.6 30% 31% Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria 2SM 85.9 12.2 -18.1 21% 23% Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria CT 77.5 8.2 -0.6 15% 19% Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria SL 70.7 1.3 8.2 27% 33% Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria CH 76.5 4.3 -9.2 18% 31% Johan Moreno SD R Peoria 4SM 92.7 17.5 5.8 20% 14% Johan Moreno SD R Peoria SL 83.2 0.6 -3.8 52% 30% Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria 4SM 93.8 12.3 4.6 13% 19% Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria CT 92.1 9.6 -1.0 23% 27% Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria SL 84.2 0.2 -3.6 34% 24% Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria CH 86.8 6.2 15.5 29% 25% Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 4SM 92.8 16.3 6.2 26% 18% Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 2SM 90.0 9.6 14.3 17% 10% Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria CT 86.8 3.2 -0.8 52% 37% Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria SL 85.7 0.7 -2.5 40% 35% Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria CH 87.5 7.9 12.3 24% 24% Tanner Smith BAL R Peoria 4SM 94.0 14.8 7.6 17% 15% Tanner Smith BAL R Peoria 2SM 93.2 7.6 12.8 30% 29% Tanner Smith BAL R Peoria CB/SLV 84.1 -12.1 -7.9 40% 36% Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria 4SM 95.7 17.6 9.0 48% 26% Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria SL 84.9 0.8 -8.8 35% 40% Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria CB/SLV 81.4 -8.2 -5.7 70% 50% Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 4SM 90.5 12.1 6.9 29% 22% Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 2SM 90.3 6.0 15.9 15% 16% Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria SL 81.9 2.4 -10.4 13% 27% Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 77.4 -0.6 -17.4 23% 21% Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria CH 84.0 1.1 14.9 22% 31% Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria 4SM 92.4 15.7 5.9 12% 22% Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria CT 87.9 4.0 -4.5 37% 32% Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria SL 84.1 0.6 -11.0 29% 35% Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria 2SM 92.0 7.3 20.2 12% 25% Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria SL 83.2 0.7 -5.0 28% 36% Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 81.3 -4.8 -5.7 29% 24% Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria CH 83.4 0.6 18.8 26% 32% Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 4SM 92.7 18.1 10.9 22% 28% Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 2SM 91.4 12.6 16.2 15% 35% Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria CT 88.1 8.4 -1.4 42% 39% Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria SL 82.7 6.2 -12.8 40% 33% Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria CH 87.4 4.1 9.5 28% 52% Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria 2SM 87.4 3.6 19.8 38% 39% Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria SL 76.0 8.9 -11.3 27% 30% Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 72.9 7.4 -14.8 41% 28% Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria CH 84.8 4.3 19.8 24% 30% Drey Jameson AZ R Salt 4SM 98.0 13.4 8.4 11% 12% Drey Jameson AZ R Salt 2SM 94.8 4.9 15.4 19% 32% Drey Jameson AZ R Salt SL 87.1 1.2 -2.2 48% 36% Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt 4SM 91.7 16.2 -0.7 35% 20% Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt SL 86.1 1.5 -4.4 33% 28% Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt CB/SLV 79.8 -10.0 0.7 45% 31% Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt 4SM 95.4 14.8 10.3 25% 23% Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt 2SM 94.9 10.9 14.1 18% 24% Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt SL 84.4 2.2 -4.4 29% 24% Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt CH 87.8 4.8 11.2 16% 20% Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt 2SM 92.6 11.9 13.8 36% 15% Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt SL 82.1 2.6 -4.4 26% 24% Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt CB/SLV 79.1 1.1 -10.1 25% 28% Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt CH 85.1 -0.7 15.2 5% 17% Jay Allmer BOS R Salt 2SM 91.4 6.2 15.2 10% 15% Jay Allmer BOS R Salt SL 81.7 5.7 -7.1 20% 21% Jay Allmer BOS R Salt CH 84.7 4.5 15.6 25% 27% Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt 2SM 93.0 13.9 -15.2 14% 31% Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt SL 84.6 2.1 5.3 34% 39% Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt CH 85.9 0.7 -14.2 42% 57% Austin Smith COL R Salt 4SM 96.6 16.5 7.8 32% 19% Austin Smith COL R Salt SL 84.6 -0.4 -6.0 35% 31% Ben Shields COL L Salt 2SM 92.9 15.5 -13.4 31% 22% Ben Shields COL L Salt SL 81.2 -1.3 10.1 37% 25% Ben Shields COL L Salt CB/SLV 80.8 -11.2 10.9 50% 46% Cade Denton COL R Salt 4SM 93.9 14.1 12.9 33% 9% Cade Denton COL R Salt 2SM 93.8 10.8 16.1 20% 22% Cade Denton COL R Salt SL 82.5 -2.0 -4.5 32% 20% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt 4SM 94.8 15.1 8.6 18% 26% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt 2SM 95.1 11.2 15.2 12% 27% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CT 86.9 4.5 -3.5 27% 28% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt SL 85.3 0.0 -4.9 47% 30% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CB/SLV 82.2 -9.0 -7.4 31% 15% Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CH 87.8 9.2 11.6 32% 14% Welinton Herrera COL L Salt 4SM 96.5 17.7 -12.2 36% 29% Welinton Herrera COL L Salt 2SM 95.7 17.6 -12.8 39% 28% Welinton Herrera COL L Salt SL 85.7 0.7 0.5 57% 34% Benny Thompson LAA R Salt 4SM 94.3 19.7 8.4 32% 23% Benny Thompson LAA R Salt SL 84.7 3.3 -4.0 28% 18% Benny Thompson LAA R Salt CH 80.9 8.6 16.2 56% 29% Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt 4SM 95.7 15.1 12.2 15% 13% Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt 2SM 93.6 10.4 16.7 20% 19% Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt SL 89.2 6.1 0.2 36% 28% Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt 4SM 97.0 15.9 12.1 31% 19% Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt 2SM 96.2 11.4 17.1 18% 19% Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt SWP 81.6 -2.9 -14.1 77% 20% Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt CB/SLV 80.3 -9.2 -16.5 63% 27% Najer Victor LAA R Salt 4SM 96.5 17.2 12.8 34% 22% Najer Victor LAA R Salt 2SM 95.9 13.3 16.7 17% 23% Najer Victor LAA R Salt SL 84.1 3.8 -4.9 61% 32% Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt 4SM 92.7 20.2 10.1 20% 23% Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CT 88.0 5.6 -2.8 47% 27% Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt SL 86.7 4.1 -2.5 22% 23% Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CB/SLV 79.7 -14.8 -7.1 32% 27% Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CH 82.7 10.7 16.5 38% 34% Carlson Reed PIT R Salt 4SM 91.8 14.3 5.5 20% 16% Carlson Reed PIT R Salt 2SM 89.6 9.2 13.9 28% 25% Carlson Reed PIT R Salt SL 82.9 3.2 -9.6 35% 23% Carlson Reed PIT R Salt CH 84.0 9.3 11.7 38% 32% Derek Diamond PIT R Salt 4SM 93.5 17.0 8.9 17% 19% Derek Diamond PIT R Salt 2SM 94.0 15.4 13.1 28% 20% Dominic Perachi PIT L Salt 4SM 90.7 16.5 -4.5 41% 24% Jaden Woods PIT L Salt 2SM 92.3 17.0 -13.7 20% 26% Jaden Woods PIT L Salt SL 82.8 2.5 0.1 28% 21% Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt 2SM 89.6 14.1 17.0 8% 31% Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt SL 82.2 7.5 -4.4 28% 28% David Hagaman TEX R Salt 4SM 94.1 17.5 10.5 23% 33% Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts 4SM 93.8 13.2 8.4 15% 19% Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts 2SM 94.2 12.6 12.8 9% 13% Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts SL 84.0 -0.7 -3.8 59% 33% Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts 4SM 91.2 17.1 9.4 22% 24% Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts 2SM 91.2 14.2 14.0 14% 33% Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts SL 83.1 4.6 -4.4 21% 25% Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts CH 83.5 8.6 16.2 38% 30% Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts 4SM 93.1 15.6 14.1 29% 14% Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts 2SM 92.7 13.9 15.6 19% 20% Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts CH 86.4 0.0 12.1 27% 38% Jake Miller DET L Scotts 4SM 92.4 18.0 -6.5 22% 23% Jake Miller DET L Scotts 2SM 92.1 17.4 -10.7 32% 10% Jake Miller DET L Scotts SL 82.5 2.1 7.2 39% 40% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts 4SM 90.7 14.6 8.7 15% 21% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts 2SM 90.5 10.8 12.5 15% 20% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CT 86.2 4.9 0.7 23% 40% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts SL 82.1 3.8 -1.3 26% 23% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CB/SLV 79.2 -2.6 -0.9 26% 16% Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CH 82.3 4.5 9.3 32% 9% Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts 4SM 96.1 17.1 4.3 30% 26% Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CT 90.1 5.9 -1.8 25% 18% Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts SL 84.6 -1.7 -10.1 33% 21% Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 83.6 -11.7 -8.2 37% 20% Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CH 86.5 4.7 10.4 38% 26% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts 4SM 91.6 18.0 9.8 21% 28% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts 2SM 91.9 16.7 13.6 13% 32% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CT 87.6 8.8 0.0 31% 29% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts SL 83.5 2.2 -1.2 35% 24% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 78.9 -10.6 -6.3 36% 21% Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CH 85.0 6.9 9.2 28% 25% Derek True HOU R Scotts 4SM 93.3 17.0 8.4 19% 24% Derek True HOU R Scotts 2SM 92.5 13.4 13.0 17% 38% Derek True HOU R Scotts CT 89.0 7.9 -0.6 14% 13% Derek True HOU R Scotts SL 82.9 2.1 -10.2 28% 13% Derek True HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 79.7 -8.3 -6.7 29% 27% Derek True HOU R Scotts CH 86.6 6.2 11.6 36% 30% Hudson Leach HOU R Scotts 4SM 95.7 17.4 8.5 31% 21% Hudson Leach HOU R Scotts CT 89.8 5.1 -4.3 47% 29% James Hicks HOU R Scotts 2SM 92.0 9.7 14.1 22% 46% James Hicks HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 79.9 -8.8 -12.7 32% 24% James Hicks HOU R Scotts CH 85.6 3.6 16.4 5% 32% Nate Wohlgemuth HOU R Scotts 2SM 93.6 15.7 16.2 32% 20% Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts 4SM 92.3 15.6 12.0 28% 18% Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts 2SM 92.1 13.2 15.1 20% 17% Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts CT 86.4 7.5 0.2 14% 7% Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts SL 84.1 6.1 -1.9 25% 21% Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts CH 81.0 0.9 16.4 65% 45% Austin Troesser NYM R Scotts 4SM 93.8 19.6 5.0 25% 19% Brett Banks NYM R Scotts 4SM 94.9 16.6 7.2 17% 19% Brett Banks NYM R Scotts SL 83.5 4.3 -10.3 29% 33% Jose T. Perez SF R Scotts 4SM 94.5 17.1 6.3 29% 27% Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts 4SM 91.8 16.4 -5.8 28% 22% Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts 2SM 91.4 12.4 -11.8 22% 32% Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts SL 81.3 -1.9 5.5 43% 35% Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts CH 86.7 6.5 -13.2 36% 36% Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts 4SM 92.9 18.0 9.3 25% 31% Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts 2SM 91.8 11.8 13.0 16% 24% Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts CT 87.2 6.6 -3.1 42% 36% Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts SL 84.0 2.4 -5.1 42% 35% Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts CH 87.4 4.9 10.3 44% 13% Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts 2SM 92.9 11.4 -14.0 28% 31% Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts SL 81.8 -0.4 4.5 26% 28% Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts CH 86.2 8.5 -14.3 39% 35% Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts 2SM 93.4 15.1 -14.3 29% 21% Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts SL 82.7 -0.6 1.2 46% 22% Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts CH 86.0 2.5 -12.0 3% 0% Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts 4SM 91.1 17.5 -9.3 38% 30% Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts 2SM 91.2 17.4 -11.9 20% 18% Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts SL 81.2 4.1 4.7 43% 47% Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts CH 84.6 13.3 -12.3 18% 28% Matt Jachec CLE R Surp 2SM 93.1 8.7 15.5 3% 32% Matt Jachec CLE R Surp SL 83.0 1.9 -9.2 46% 36% Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp 4SM 92.2 16.1 4.9 28% 27% Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp SL 82.8 2.6 -6.9 31% 28% Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp CB/SLV 77.5 -7.7 -11.0 41% 13% Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp 4SM 91.2 18.2 8.2 18% 32% Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CT 86.0 7.0 0.0 16% 25% Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp SL 84.7 5.8 0.5 41% 36% Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CB/SLV 78.4 -10.3 -4.8 26% 22% Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CH 81.2 8.5 14.9 40% 30% Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp 4SM 94.7 12.5 3.2 19% 18% Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp CT 89.2 5.3 -3.0 32% 24% Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp SL 85.6 0.9 -4.9 50% 35% A.J. Causey KC R Surp 2SM 90.2 1.2 18.0 17% 25% A.J. Causey KC R Surp CB/SLV 76.4 0.5 -13.3 42% 29% A.J. Causey KC R Surp CH 82.0 1.3 19.9 42% 26% Dennis Colleran KC R Surp 4SM 97.5 13.2 9.5 35% 18% Dennis Colleran KC R Surp 2SM 97.8 10.0 13.7 26% 21% Dennis Colleran KC R Surp CT 90.6 6.3 -3.9 43% 33% Dennis Colleran KC R Surp SL 87.2 4.1 -8.2 31% 19% Hunter Owen KC L Surp 4SM 92.2 18.3 -6.8 28% 24% Hunter Owen KC L Surp SL 85.2 4.1 5.3 32% 23% Hunter Owen KC L Surp CB/SLV 75.4 -13.4 9.2 42% 22% Hunter Owen KC L Surp CH 84.9 9.7 -11.0 31% 31% L.P. Langevin KC R Surp 2SM 94.5 11.6 18.5 33% 16% Logan Martin KC R Surp 4SM 94.3 18.2 9.9 17% 29% Logan Martin KC R Surp 2SM 94.2 16.1 13.5 21% 22% Logan Martin KC R Surp CT 87.1 6.3 -2.9 46% 30% Logan Martin KC R Surp SL 84.4 3.4 -5.8 20% 25% Logan Martin KC R Surp CH 85.5 8.1 15.1 38% 20% Anthony Flores MIL L Surp 4SM 88.6 10.6 -3.9 18% 18% Anthony Flores MIL L Surp SL 83.5 0.1 8.1 29% 30% Anthony Flores MIL L Surp CH 88.4 9.5 -9.1 14% 10% Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp 4SM 94.3 13.9 4.8 17% 18% Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp 2SM 92.8 9.7 13.0 15% 18% Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp CT 88.8 4.4 -3.6 24% 30% Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp SL 83.0 2.0 -12.3 34% 35% Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp CB/SLV 80.2 -5.2 -12.3 28% 27% Jesus Broca MIL L Surp 4SM 92.8 14.5 -4.8 20% 18% Jesus Broca MIL L Surp 2SM 93.5 9.2 -12.0 15% 27% Jesus Broca MIL L Surp SL 78.9 -1.8 7.6 34% 13% Jesus Broca MIL L Surp CH 84.4 6.9 -12.3 29% 37% Nate Peterson MIL L Surp 4SM 90.9 17.6 -3.8 22% 24% Nate Peterson MIL L Surp SL 82.9 0.7 5.5 27% 32% Nate Peterson MIL L Surp CB/SLV 77.0 -9.1 6.5 32% 26% Nate Peterson MIL L Surp CH 84.9 3.2 -10.6 21% 20% Daniel Harper PHI R Surp 4SM 95.3 17.4 10.2 26% 35% Daniel Harper PHI R Surp 2SM 94.5 14.9 13.7 21% 31% Daniel Harper PHI R Surp CT 89.1 6.9 0.4 26% 24% Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp 4SM 94.8 16.6 6.4 16% 24% Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp 2SM 93.3 11.7 14.4 15% 22% Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp CB/SLV 82.6 -11.8 -7.7 28% 21% Jack Dallas PHI R Surp 4SM 91.6 17.1 6.3 22% 17% Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CT 86.4 5.9 -4.2 13% 32% Jack Dallas PHI R Surp SL 82.7 0.7 -12.5 33% 46% Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CB/SLV 80.3 -3.6 -15.5 24% 28% Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CH 83.6 0.8 13.8 33% 30% Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp 4SM 95.5 19.8 7.1 27% 23% Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp CT 86.7 6.3 -4.1 46% 28% Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp SL 83.6 2.8 -3.9 38% 20% Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp 4SM 93.4 18.7 8.4 33% 39% Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp CT 88.6 9.2 1.6 29% 28% Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp CH 86.7 3.0 11.0 45% 38% Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp 4SM 98.1 10.1 14.5 16% 19% Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp 2SM 96.8 7.6 15.6 21% 11% Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp SL 86.1 0.5 -0.9 62% 30% Joey Danielson TEX R Surp 4SM 95.5 17.4 10.0 42% 28% Joey Danielson TEX R Surp 2SM 93.6 6.4 17.5 21% 24% Joey Danielson TEX R Surp CT 89.6 8.9 -0.7 31% 37% Joey Danielson TEX R Surp SL 83.9 1.8 -9.3 30% 19% Jose Corniell TEX R Surp 4SM 95.8 15.5 10.5 33% 33% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp 4SM 92.8 15.6 8.7 23% 14% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp 2SM 92.9 12.0 14.6 21% 18% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CT 86.4 3.9 -4.1 35% 29% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp SL 84.8 1.1 -5.5 43% 28% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CB/SLV 78.2 -9.4 -10.3 48% 37% Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CH 79.2 1.6 17.4 53% 30% Winston Santos TEX R Surp 4SM 94.2 17.3 9.3 35% 43% Arizona Fall League Pitchers’ Release Data Pitcher Org Arm AFL Ext RelHt RelSd Cory Wall ATL R Glendale 6.4 69.7 -22 LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 7.1 59.9 -18 Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale 6.5 81.6 -23 Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale 5.9 61.3 -27 Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale 6.5 82.6 -13 Connor McCullough CWS R Glendale 5.8 63.5 -25 Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 6.7 65.0 33 Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 6.5 77.3 -22 Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale 6.6 68.2 -16 Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale 6.2 66.3 -27 Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 6.4 71.6 -15 Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 6.0 63.5 25 Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale 6.1 64.0 17 Payton Martin LAD R Glendale 6.8 69.5 -14 D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale 6.5 82.5 -13 Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 5.8 68.3 -15 Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 6.4 70.2 -13 Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 5.4 68.9 -18 Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale 6.9 72.0 -29 Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale 6.0 69.3 -18 Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale 5.9 56.6 23 Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 6.4 66.0 -38 Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 5.9 71.1 -15 Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 6.2 73.9 -22 Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa 6.4 73.7 -31 Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa 5.9 75.2 -11 Will Johnston ATH L Mesa 6.0 81.1 3 JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 6.3 75.2 -25 Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 6.2 64.3 -33 Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 5.8 62.4 -13 Thomas Mangus CHC R Mesa 5.8 75.0 -16 Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 7.2 68.9 -26 Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 6.0 74.6 20 Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 6.0 69.3 -28 Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa 5.8 71.5 -16 Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 7.0 71.3 -18 Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 6.1 63.2 -19 Andrew Lindsey TB R Mesa 6.2 60.1 -21 Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 7.0 67.4 -20 Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa 6.2 69.1 -19 Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 6.1 68.7 -21 Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria 6.8 72.5 18 Luis De León BAL L Peoria 5.9 75.0 19 Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria 5.6 67.9 18 Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria 6.5 68.9 -18 Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria 6.1 66.4 -30 Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria 6.6 69.4 -15 Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria 7.1 69.9 -16 Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria 6.2 68.3 -24 Jakob Hall MIN R Peoria 6.2 68.8 -21 Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria 6.0 60.0 31 Johan Moreno SD R Peoria 5.8 76.3 -14 Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria 6.0 72.4 -14 Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 6.0 70.6 -14 Tanner Smith BAL R Peoria 6.5 69.5 -17 Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria 6.9 66.9 -17 Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 5.9 58.5 -9 Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria 5.8 66.7 -28 Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria 6.3 59.6 -19 Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 6.1 68.8 -10 Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria 5.9 39.4 -51 Drey Jameson AZ R Salt River 5.5 71.0 -23 Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt River 7.2 80.2 7 Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt River 6.7 65.2 -23 Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt River 5.6 55.4 -23 Jay Allmer BOS R Salt River 6.0 64.9 -21 Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt River 6.6 66.2 40 Austin Smith COL R Salt River 7.1 67.5 -16 Ben Shields COL L Salt River 6.7 66.1 19 Cade Denton COL R Salt River 6.0 62.3 -27 Jack Mahoney COL R Salt River 6.1 67.9 -30 Welinton Herrera COL L Salt River 6.1 70.5 11 Benny Thompson LAA R Salt River 5.3 74.8 1 Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt River 6.1 65.0 -21 Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt River 5.6 74.1 -12 Najer Victor LAA R Salt River 6.5 70.2 -25 Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt River 5.9 71.4 -7 Carlson Reed PIT R Salt River 6.7 75.2 -20 Derek Diamond PIT R Salt River 6.7 68.4 -28 Dominic Perachi PIT L Salt River 6.0 74.9 24 Jaden Woods PIT L Salt River 6.9 68.2 25 Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt River 6.7 65.0 -18 David Hagaman TEX R Salt River 6.9 70.0 -15 Juan Sanchez SF R Scottsdale 5.9 61.1 -23 Carlos Lequerica DET R Scottsdale 6.6 72.3 -15 Dariel Fregio DET R Scottsdale 6.1 65.7 -24 Jake Miller DET L Scottsdale 6.1 68.2 29 Kenny Serwa DET R Scottsdale 6.3 66.1 -16 Anderson Brito HOU R Scottsdale 6.5 70.2 -12 Brett Gillis HOU R Scottsdale 6.6 70.1 -21 Derek True HOU R Scottsdale 6.5 73.9 -19 Hudson Leach HOU R Scottsdale 6.0 72.0 -21 James Hicks HOU R Scottsdale 5.7 66.1 -28 Nate Wohlgemuth HOU R Scottsdale 5.4 69.0 -17 Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scottsdale 6.3 60.8 -26 Austin Troesser NYM R Scottsdale 6.7 73.8 -17 Brett Banks NYM R Scottsdale 6.3 70.7 -19 Jose T. Perez SF R Scottsdale 6.2 67.5 -16 Ricardo Estrada SF L Scottsdale 5.9 67.1 9 Austin Amaral WSH R Scottsdale 6.7 67.6 -16 Jake Bennett WSH L Scottsdale 7.1 67.4 31 Jared Simpson WSH L Scottsdale 6.1 68.3 12 Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scottsdale 6.1 68.7 19 Matt Jachec CLE R Surprise 6.2 68.5 -30 Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surprise 6.8 70.3 -17 Trenton Denholm CLE R Surprise 6.1 66.6 -5 Zane Morehouse CLE R Surprise 6.6 65.1 -23 A.J. Causey KC R Surprise 5.7 54.8 -15 Dennis Colleran KC R Surprise 6.6 59.5 -28 Hunter Owen KC L Surprise 6.6 78.8 14 L.P. Langevin KC R Surprise 5.3 62.2 -29 Logan Martin KC R Surprise 6.4 72.8 -22 Anthony Flores MIL L Surprise 5.9 61.8 22 Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surprise 6.7 68.7 -24 Jesus Broca MIL L Surprise 5.5 68.7 18 Nate Peterson MIL L Surprise 5.8 69.3 13 Daniel Harper PHI R Surprise 5.7 72.4 -19 Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surprise 6.8 73.7 -19 Jack Dallas PHI R Surprise 5.9 68.2 -36 Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surprise 6.4 77.8 -14 Tommy McCollum PHI R Surprise 7.3 73.4 -13 Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surprise 5.5 70.7 -14 Joey Danielson TEX R Surprise 6.1 72.6 -27 Jose Corniell TEX R Surprise 6.1 69.7 -19 Kolton Curtis TEX R Surprise 6.7 68.1 -19 Winston Santos TEX R Surprise 6.6 69.7 -25 Data is from each pitcher’s most used fastball. Extension in feet (so 6.3 = 6’4″), release data in inches. Source View the full article

Jared Leto as Ares in Disney's TRON: ARES. Photo by Leah Gallo. © 2025 Disney Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Tron: Ares reviews are beginning to come in, with most reacting poorly to the latest Disney movie starring Jared Leto. What are critics saying about Tron: Ares? Over on Rotten Tomatoes, Tron: Ares sits at a 57% overall, with 58 reviews in so far. Despite the negative reaction to the film, Ares’ score still does sit slightly higher than its predecessor, 2010’s Tron: Legacy (51%), for now. Both films score lower than 1982’s Tron, which has a 61% score on Rotten Tomatoes. TheWrap’s William Bibbiani didn’t hold back, saying that the film had a “great frickin’ soundtrack,” but that the movie “completely sucks” otherwise. The Hollywood Reporter’s David Rooney was slightly nicer, saying “it’s no sci-fi insta-classic, but there are worse things to be than a surprisingly entertaining post-summer popcorn bucket.” Rolling Stone’s David Fear said that the Tron series was in a tough position, needing to either reboot itself or call it quits. With Ares, Fear says, Disney “chose the systems upgrade. It’s Game Over regardless.” USA Today’s Brian Truitt was equally negative, praising the soundtrack and Jeff Bridges, but noting “traveling to that nifty high-tech landscape in this third ‘Tron’ outing has become a chore.” It wasn’t all negative, though. Consequence’s Liz Shannon Miller praises the film for being a “big spectacle,” while Indiewire’s David Ehrlich calls it a movie that is “relevant, palatable, and undemanding enough” to turn Tron into a new franchise. ComingSoon’s Jonathan Sim also praised the movie, calling it a “stellar cinematic experience.” Alongside Jared Leto, Tron: Ares also features a star-studded cast that includes Greta Lee, Evan Peters, Hasan Minhaj, Jodie Turner-Smith, Arturo Castro, Cameron Monaghan, Gillian Anderson, Jeff Bridges, and Sarah Desjardins. Tron: Ares will be the third official feature film in Disney’s Tron franchise following 1982’s Tron and 2010’s Tron: Legacy. The film is directed by Joachim Rønning, who previously made 2019’s Maleficent: Mistress of Evil and 2024’s Young Woman and the Sea. He also co-directed 2017’s Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales with Espen Sandberg. The script for the film is written by Jesse Wigutow. Originally reported by Anthony Nash on SuperHeroHype. The post Tron: Ares Reviews Divide Critics, Get Mediocre Rotten Tomatoes Score appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

One week ago, the Rays officially changed hands, with a group led by Patrick Zalupski stepping in for Stuart Sternberg. An introductory press conference was held today, featuring Zalupski and other key personnel, with Marc Topkin of The Tampa Bay Times reporting on the proceedings. With the Rays, the natural focus is stadium plans and that was indeed the case today. Sternberg had been trying for years to get a new stadium plan in place. There was a plan to knock down Tropicana Field and replace it with a new stadium complex. That plan appeared to be on the proverbial one-yard line before hurricane damage to the Trop threw the plan off course. The subsequent squabbling between Sternberg and government officials scuttled the plan and soured the relationship to such a degree that this sale was the result. The new ownership group is naturally going to resume that search for a future home. The Trop may be repaired to a playable state by the start of the 2026 season. Even if that does come to pass, the club’s lease there only runs through 2028, leaving the future up in the air. The Zalupski group said today that it plans to pursue an “aggressive and perhaps audacious” plan which would include a fixed roof stadium as part “world class live/work/play experience” in a complex of over 100 acres which would open in time for the 2029 season. The Battery complex which surrounds Atlanta’s Truist Park was cited as “the gold standard” for what the group has in mind. This type of project has become more popular for sports franchises in recent years. By having non-sports businesses in a larger interconnected network of commerce including things like office towers, hotels and restaurants, it diversifies the portfolio and lessens the pressure on the team to be successful. Even if the club is performing poorly and there’s a drop in terms of attendance and/or television ratings, the owners could still be making money off the other elements of the complex. What’s still to be determined is the financing for this plan. Per Topkin, the group acknowledged the need for public contributions. That’s another element that modern sports owners love, as it’s obviously a much nicer arrangement if someone else is putting up the money for your real estate projects. Government officials often feel compelled to comply with such plans out of fear that opposing them will hurt at the ballot box. Just last year, Royals owner John Sherman essentially admitted that he bluffed a threat to take that team out of Kansas City because he thought it would help him sway voters in a ballot measure about stadium funding. Securing that government funding will likely be a key storyline for the Rays in the coming weeks and months. As mentioned, Sternberg’s worsening relationships with public officials made it essentially impossible for him to move forward as owner, which led to this sale. Sternberg’s plan was set in St. Petersburg, meaning he was dealing with officials in that city and officials from Pinellas County. Zalupski’s group is expected to target Tampa, meaning a different city council and also a different county, as Tampa is in Hillsborough County. That could provide some optimism about getting something done but Sternberg also previously explored Tampa without much success. Tampa mayor Jane Castor was present at the press conference today and said the city is “not going to spend tax dollars on building” a stadium. Topkin notes that Zalupski’s group will be meeting with officials from both Tampa and St. Petersburg, perhaps indicating they are keeping their options open or maybe just doing due diligence. Topkin’s report also adds some specific locations which could be fits. If the group is successful in getting a stadium and larger complex built, Zalupski suggests that would be good for the team on the field. “It’s what you have to have in today’s Major League Baseball to be successful,” Zalupski said. “We think without that revenue generation, it’s going to be really, really challenging or nearly impossible to compete with the major markets. So for us, this is critical to building a championship team.” The Rays are well established as one of the lower-spending clubs in the majors. According to Cot’s Baseball Contracts, their payroll has been in the bottom third of the league for over 20 years. They have still found some success despite that investment, which is often attributed to the club’s cutting-edge approach to analytics. They made the playoffs five straight years from 2019 to 2023, though they’ve dropped to just below .500 in the past two seasons. Combining the club’s analytical bent with some more resources would be a nice boost, though that may take years to come to fruition. At this point, there’s no real way to tell if the Rays owners are genuine in that plan to make more meaningful investments in the team, but Zalupski did elaborate. “We’ve got to deliver this world-class development, generate the revenue to produce a consistent champion,” Zalupski said. “You don’t want to be one year great and five years bad and have to go all in. We want to build a sustainable championship team. I think the revenue generation that can come out of this development, will provide that.” For what it’s worth, Atlanta did ramp up spending after Truist Park opened in 2017. According to Cot’s, their payroll has moved into the top ten recently, after being more middle-of-the-pack in the preceding decade. On the other hand, it was also hoped that the Twins would open up a new era of spending when Target Field opened in 2010, but Cot’s shows that didn’t really happen. It’s unclear what would happen if the new stadium cannot be ready by the start of 2029. St. Petersburg Mayor Ken Welch has said the city would be open to a Trop extension but they are also planning new developments of the site which could involve the Trop being torn down, per Colleen Wright of The Tampa Bay Times. Photo courtesy of Kim Klement, Imagn Images View the full article

Photo Credit: Lucasfilm Another Ahsoka Season 2 actor has announced they have finished filming their scenes. Just yesterday, Sabine Wren star Natasha Liu Bordizzo confirmed that she had finished filming her scenes for the second season of the popular Star Wars show. At the time, she shared a behind-the-scenes silhouette photo of herself and Rosario Dawson in costume as Sabine and Ahsoka Tano. Now, Ezra Bridger actor Eman Esfandi has taken to Instagram to announce that he, too, has officially wrapped production on his scenes for Ahsoka Season 2. What did Eman Esfandi say about Ahsoka Season 2? Esfandi said in his post, “Prayed that season 2 would go smoothly, be an epic adventure, and take everything to a new level. Locked in to make sure I was in the best head space I could be in to serve a story much larger than any one person. That’s what I wanted, and I’m certain I got it. So grateful and so excited for y’all to tune in. Godspeed and may the force be with you all. Thanks, London.” View the post below: The cast of Ahsoka Season 2 also includes Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Hera Syndulla, Ivanna Sakhno as Shin Hate, and Hayden Christensen as Anakin Skywalker. Additionally, Rory McCann will be taking over the role of Baylan Skoll, replacing Ray Stevenson, who passed away in May 2023. Filming for Ahsoka Season 2 began in April 2025 in the United Kingdom after Lucasfilm renewed the series in January 2024. Bryce Dallas Howard has confirmed that she’s directing two episodes of the new Ahsoka season, which will have eight episodes in total. The show is created by Dave Filoni, who serves as the series’ showrunner. A premiere date for Ahsoka Season 2 has not yet been announced. The first season, meanwhile, is available to watch on the Disney+ streaming service. Originally reported by Brandon Schreur at SuperHeroHype. The post Ezra Bridger Actor Gives Ahsoka Season 2 Update After Wrapping Scenes appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

(Photo Credit: Amazon MGM Studio) ComingSoon spoke with Maintenance Required stars Madelaine Petsch and Jacob Scipio about their new movie. The duo discussed finding their chemistry in the romantic comedy, playing different types of roles, and more. The film will stream exclusively on Prime Video on October 8, 2025. “Charlie, the fiercely independent owner of an all-female mechanic shop, is forced to reevaluate her future when a flashy corporate competitor moves in across the street. Seeking comfort, she turns to an anonymous online confidant – unaware she’s confiding in Beau, the very rival threatening her business. As sparks fly both online and off, the truth threatens to blow everything apart,” says the official synopsis. Tyler Treese: Madelaine, what was your level of auto repair knowledge going into this role? Because I was so impressed by how you were making adjustments to the cars, and it looked so realistic to me. So if you don’t, you completely fooled me. Madelaine Petsch: Thank you. Before the movie, I had no knowledge. I couldn’t even add windshield wiper fluid to my car. But I spent time in a garage and learning how to do all the things I needed to do in the movie and being really comfortable under the car, in the hood of the car, fixing things. So all of what you saw was real by the time we started shooting the movie. Jacob, I wanted to ask about your first face-to-face scene with Madelaine in the auto shop, because you’re both kind of equally charming and awkward in that scene. How was it that balancing act of finding chemistry, but not fully acting on it? Jacob Scipio: Yeah, man. I mean, it’s kind of like that when you find someone that you have that initial spark with, they bring out that awkward nature in you because you want to impress and you want to be yourself, but at the same time, you don’t wanna show too much and play it cool. So working with Madelaine, that scene was awesome because we really found a way to walk that line and have all the elements of those emotions that you get from a meet-cute. Madelaine, there’s a lot of buildup and setbacks to this relationship. I feel like the ‘will they, won’t they’ is just gonna hook viewers. So, what did you like most about that tension between these two, and how they just can’t get on the right track? Petsch: Well, I think it’s ultimately really realistic to the way that people date these days. But I also like, as an actor, when there’s tension or there’s pressure, there’s so much more ability to make diamonds, I think, in performance than when there’s just open range. So there was so much room to play in these spaces where you could bring out any emotion, and there are so many undercurrents of what they are actually feeling. And so it’s so much more fun and complex as an actor. Jacob, I’ve loved you in the Bad Boys movies, so it was really interesting getting to see you do just a totally different type of role. What did you find most interesting about getting to explore a character’s softer side rather than, you know, kicking and doing a more macho role? Jacob Scipio: Yeah, man, it was a fun opportunity to act in a movie without holding a gun for once. I didn’t know if it was possible, but it is. I switched the gun for a wrench in this movie, and yeah. Beau, he’s probably the closest to me to myself personality-wise and character-wise. So it was great to play just a regular guy who’s just yearning for love. That’s good that you’re not walking around with a gun all the time in real life. Scipio: No, I save that one for the movies [laughs]. Madelaine, my last question for you. I saw The Strangers: Chapter 2 last night, and I had so much fun watching you fight this boar, which I was not expecting at all. What was your reaction when you saw that you were going into hand-to-hand combat with this giant pig? That was crazy. Madelaine Petsch: Well, I did a big, “What? Are you sure? Okay. Yeah, let’s… sure!” I mean, look, the thing is, as an actor, anything that feels like intimidating or challenging or scary, I wanna do what I wanna jump into. It was a really hard thing to shoot, I’ll be honest with you, but I did it and I like it. The post How Madelaine Petsch & Jacob Scipio Found Authentic Chemistry in Maintenance Required | Interview appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

This week's mailbag gets into the Reds' offense, whether Alex Bregman, Bo Bichette, and Jorge Polanco will stay with their respective clubs, trade targets for the Braves' rotation, and whether the Rangers could trade Jacob deGrom. Bill asks: What can the Cincinnati Reds possibly do to fix the mess that is their lineup? They need at least one big bat and probably do not have the money to accomplish that. The Reds' offense ranked eighth in the NL with 4.42 runs scored per game. Let's examine where the lineup stands after the Reds were eliminated by the Dodgers in the Wild Card round. C: Jose Trevino and Tyler Stephenson handled catching duties. 1B: Spencer Steer was the regular this year, but rookie Sal Stewart began taking starts after coming up in September. 2B: Matt McLain was the typical choice, with Gavin Lux starting occasionally. SS: Elly De La Cruz has the full-time job. 3B: Ke'Bryan Hayes took most starts, with a few going to Stewart. Before Hayes was acquired, Santiago Espinal logged innings here. LF: Austin Hays was the top choice, followed by Lux and Will Benson. CF: TJ Friedl has the full-time job. RF: Noelvi Marte took over the starting job. Jake Fraley spent time here before getting injured, and Benson was also in the mix. DH: Of late, it was a Lux/Miguel Andujar time share. Hays also picked up a good number of ABs here. No one on the Reds had a stellar offensive season. Almost every regular fell between a 97 wRC+ and a 109 mark, with 100 being league average. Where can improvements be found? Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription BENEFITS Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco. Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony. Remove ads and support our writers. Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker View the full article

With the Guardians having been eliminated from the postseason, some details about their offseason are now coming to light. Per Tim Stebbins of of MLB.com, right-hander Nic Enright will undergo Tommy John surgery in the coming weeks. That will mean he’ll miss the entire 2026 season. Also, designated hitter David Fry will be undergoing surgery for a deviated septum and a fractured nose. His timeline was not specified. It’s a challenging situation for Enright, a young player who has already been through a lot. He announced in February of 2023 that he was undergoing treatment for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. He had been with the Marlins at that time after that club took him from the Guardians in the Rule 5 draft a few months earlier. He was returned to the Guardians in June of that year. In 2024, a lat strain limited him to just 17 Triple-A innings, though the results were good. He only allowed two earned runs on nine hits and five walks while racking up 32 strikeouts. The Guards gave him a 40-man spot in November of that year, to prevent him from being scooped up in the Rule 5 yet again. That allowed him to make his major league debut this year, which went quite well. While frequently being shuttled to Triple-A and back, he logged 31 innings in the big leagues with a 2.03 ERA, 23.6% strikeout rate and 9.4% walk rate. He also had a 1.38 ERA in 13 Triple-A frames. He was placed on the major league injured list in September due to right elbow/forearm inflammation. Presumably, he has spent the past month exploring his options, which has led him to the surgeon’s table. If the Guardians keep him on the 40-man roster through the winter, he could spend all of 2026 on the 60-day injured list. However, there’s no IL in the offseason, so he would need to hold a spot until then. It has also been a challenging year for Fry. He seemed to break out in 2024, hitting 14 home runs in 122 games, leading to a .263/.356/.448 line and 129 wRC+. But shortly after that season ended, he required surgery on the ulnar collateral ligament in his right elbow. That was going to cause him to miss time in 2025 and be limited to DH duties when he did return. He was reinstated from the IL at the end of May. He struggled badly, putting up a .171/.229/.363 line this year. His season was then ended in scary fashion when a pitch from Tarik Skubal hit him in the face. It was initially reported that he would recover in six to eight weeks without the need for surgery, though that plan has evidently changed. Ideally, he can heal up in time for a healthy offseason and spring training but perhaps more updates will be forthcoming throughout the winter. Photo courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas, Imagn Images View the full article

Image credit: Netflix There’s a new Geralt in The Witcher universe, and it’s one that showrunner Lauren Schmidt Hissrich believes will quickly become the new fan favorite. Henry Cavill — who is best known for playing Superman in the DC Extended Universe — portrayed Geralt of Rivia in the first three seasons of The Witcher. Despite being a fan of the source material, Cavill departed the series in October 2022, with Liam Hemsworth later cast as his replacement. Hemsworth will portray Geralt in the upcoming fourth season, as well as the fifth season, which is already in production. Why will fans forget about Henry Cavill’s Geralt after watching The Witcher Season 4? The Witcher fandom was not too pleased with the Geralt recasting when it was first announced. However, while speaking with Tudum, Hissrich boldly claimed that fans will end up preferring Hemsworth’s take on Geralt over Cavill’s, remarking, “People think of Geralt, and now they have specific images in their mind. Within about 45 seconds, I don’t think you really think about it much more. Liam owns this character.” Of course, Hissrich has been a fan of Hemsworth taking over the role of Geralt since their first meeting. “The very first time that I met with Liam Hemsworth, in my gut, I knew that he would make a perfect Geralt for us in Season 4, because he was able to be very honest with me about the things that really resonated with him in earlier seasons, and also some things he’d like to shift,” recalled the showrunner. “After the Continent-altering events of Season Three, Geralt, Yennefer, and Ciri find themselves separated by a raging war and countless enemies,” reads the official synopsis for The Witcher Season 4. “As their paths diverge, and their goals sharpen, they stumble on unexpected allies eager to join their journeys. And if they can accept these found families, they just might have a chance at reuniting for good…” Starring alongside Hemsworth in the fourth season of The Witcher are returning cast members Anya Chalotra as Yennefer of Vengerberg, Freya Allan as Princess Cirilla of Cintra, Joey Batey as Jaskier, Eamon Farren as Cahir, Anna Shaffer as Triss Merrigold, Mimî M Khayisa as Fringilla, Cassie Clare as Philippa, and Mahesh Jadu as Vilgefortz, as well as new addition Laurence Fishburne as Regis. All eight episodes of The Witcher Season 4 arrive on Netflix on October 30, 2025. Originally reported by Lee Freitag at SuperHeroHype. The post The Witcher Boss on Why Fans Will Immediately Forget about Henry Cavill in Season 4 appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

Photo Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures Heat 2 is moving forward. Heat was released in 1995. Directed by Michael Mann, the epic crime film stars Al Pacino as Vincent Hanna, Robert De Niro as Neil McCauley, Val Kilmer as Chris Shiherlis, Jon Voight as Nate, and Tom Sizemore as Michael Cheritto. In 2022, Mann co-wrote a Heat 2 — which serves as both a prequel and a sequel to the original movie — crime novel with author Meg Gardiner. Mann intended to turn the book into a feature film at Warner Bros. Pictures; however, development on the project has been stalled due to budget disagreements. What is the Heat 2 update? According to The Hollywood Reporter, after Warner Bros. decided to let the movie be shopped around in August 2025, Amazon MGM Studios’ United Artists division is now in talks to acquire the rights to the movie. Jerry Bruckheimer, Scott Stuber, and Nick Nesbitt have also now joined the project as producers. The Hollywood Reporter claims that Warner Bros. was willing to make Heat 2 for around $140 million, or, alternatively, for $150 million if Mann would commit to making a Heat 3. The initial budget for Heat 2, however, came in at $230 million before Mann whittled it down to $170 million. How big a budget Heat 2 will get at United Artists is unclear at this time. Paramount and Sony were also interested in acquiring the project before it was acquired by Amazon. No official casting for Heat 2 has been announced at this time, though there have been plenty of rumors going around. One of the more popular names to emerge is Leonardo DiCaprio, while Austin Butler, Adam Driver, and Bradley Cooper have also been mentioned in past articles. No offers have been made to any talent as of yet. A release date for Heat 2, which will be executive produced by Eric Roth and Shane Salerno, has not yet been set. The post Heat 2: Michael Mann Movie Gets Big Update Following WB Budget Battle appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

As more book bans and attacks on the First Amendment rights of American citizens continue, so, too, do the lawsuits aimed at stopping these actions. Today, the American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina filed a lawsuit against State Education Superintendent Ellen Weaver over unjust book bans due to Regulation 43-170 and a 2025 classroom censorship memo. It was filed on behalf of the South Carolina Association of School Librarians and three public school students under the age of 18. The filing can be read in full here. Regulation 43-170 became law in June 2024. It bans all materials in public kindergarten through 12th grade classrooms if that material contains any “sexual conduct.” The regulation has led to the banning of 22 books across the state, putting South Carolina at the top of the list for most state-sanctioned book bans. The lawsuit challenges the Regulation’s constitutionality. The Regulation does not utilize the Miller Test–the Supreme Court’s three-prong assessment of whether or not something is obscene–in making its determination of whether or not material contains “sexual conduct.” The vagueness in the regulation is its feature, as this allows for broad interpretation and wide, sloppy application. A second piece of the lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a memo penned and distributed by Weaver on March 14, 2025. The memo bans 14 concepts from being discussed in SC Department of Education materials, including “implicit bias,” “restorative justice,” “cisgender,” and “social-emotional learning.” “The confusion and fear stemming from Regulation 43-170 and Ellen Weaver’s memorandum have been overwhelming,” said Dylan Rhyne, a high school senior in the Charleston County School District and plaintiff in the lawsuit. “I hope that by taking action now, we can restore the safe and welcoming school environment I once knew and make things even better for those to come.” It’s not only the removal of books that have caused difficulty in South Carolina public schools. So, too, has the fear of what targets may come next. Among the actions that have happened in the state as a result of the Regulation include: The end of classroom libraries in some schools, as a result of worry that materials included there may be outside of what the state deems appropriate; Quiet and silent censorship among school librarians who are electing not to purchase new fiction titles for their collection and/or are preemptively removing titles; The addition of 9 restricted titles in Beaufort County Public Schools so students need permission slips to access books like The Kite Runner and The Bluest Eye, titles routinely part of Advanced Placement curriculum; The removal of access to county library digital collections by public schools for fear of potential access to titles with “sexual conduct,” as in Fort Mills. “The “need” for this regulation was manufactured by SC Superintendent of Education Ellen Weaver (who has direct, public ties to Moms for Liberty) under the guise of an absence of a ‘uniform process for local school boards to review and hold public hearings on complaints raised within its district,'” explained Jamie Gregory, immediate past president of the South Carolina Association of School Librarians in an interview at Book Riot earlier this year. “In other words, supporters of the regulation didn’t like that local school districts have control over which instructional materials are available in school libraries, so they dubbed this local control as “confusing” since districts may have different local policies and procedures. It’s important to note that the impetus for this regulation originated with Ellen Weaver and her outside legal counsel with ties to the Federalist Society (who was paid over $40,000 of taxpayer money), not the SC State Board of Education.” This is not the first lawsuit in the state of South Carolina over book bans. The ACLU of South Carolina also sued Greenville County over the banning and restriction of LGBTQ+ books for minors in the county’s public library earlier this year. As of writing, 22 books have been permanently banned from all South Carolina public schools. They are: Damsel by Elana K. Arnold Ugly Love by Colleen Hoover A Court of Frost and Starlight by Sarah J. Maas A Court of Mist and Fury by Sarah J. Maas A Court of Thorns and Roses by Sarah J. Maas A Court of Wings and Ruin by Sarah J. Maas Normal People by Sally Rooney The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson Flamer by Mike Curato Push by Sapphire Collateral by Ellen Hopkins Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo Empire of Storms by Sarah J. Maas Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Hopeless by Colleen Hoover Identical by Ellen Hopkins Kingdom of Ash by Sarah J. Maas Living Dead Girl by Elizabeth Scott Lucky by Alice Sebold Tricks by Ellen Hopkins Crank by Ellen Hopkins was not banned, but it requires parental permission before any students may access it in their school library. “Censorship in schools limits students’ ability to think critically and engage with diverse perspectives. K-12 students deserve intellectual freedom that empowers them to explore ideas, question assumptions, and develop critical thinking skills,” said Tenley Middleton, President of the South Carolina Association of School Librarians. “Leadership from the South Carolina Association of School Librarians has persistently sought to engage with the Department of Education and the State Board regarding Regulation 43-170 — to no avail. We stand with the ACLU of South Carolina in denouncing censorship and championing intellectual freedom.” Read a full interview with Tenley Middleton and Jamie Gregory, both members of the leadership team of the South Carolina Association of School Librarians. They discuss the on-the-ground advocacy happening across their state and offer critical insight into the ways that the state’s Regulation has harmed access to materials in public schools for students and done tremendous damage to the library profession. This lawsuit is another example of testing the court’s interpretation of the First Amendment Rights of library users. Last week, a judge ruled that library users and authors do not have First Amendment Rights when it comes to public school and public libraries. That ruling pulled heavily from a decision in the Fifth Circuit from earlier this year, which established no First Amendment Rights for users in public libraries in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. These two cases contradict the prevailing Island Trees School District vs. Pico Supreme Court ruling from 1982, which which held that public school libraries are places for voluntary inquiry and dissemination of information and ideas. View the full article

Photo Credit: Walt Disney Pictures Disney has found its next big fantasy franchise. Walt Disney Studios already has a number of major sci-fi fantasy franchises under its umbrella, including the MCU, Star Wars, and the Avatar movies. Now, the company has acquired another property in a seven-figure deal. What is Disney’s new fantasy movie franchise? Per Deadline, Disney has won an auction for the rights to Impossible Creatures, a fantasy series by author Katherine Rundell. Rundell is now working on adapting the first two books in the series into screenplays. There are five Impossible Creatures novels planned in total, with the first one having been published in 2023. The second installment, titled The Poisoned King, was just recently released last month. “Rundell just became the first U.K. children’s author since J.K. Rowling to simultaneously reach the No. 1 position on the children’s book charts in both the U.K. and the U.S. Her books so far have sold more than four million copies worldwide, and in 2024 she was awarded both Author of The Year and Children’s Book of The Year at The British Book Awards,” Deadline’s article notes. “Rundell signed two 7-figure publishing deals with Bloomsbury and Knopf. What she originally planned as a trilogy has become a five-novel saga and Rundell plans to broaden the franchise with spinoffs and prequel books.” Warner Bros. and Netflix were the other two finalists looking to acquire the rights to Impossible Creatures. “When I read Impossible Creatures, I knew it belonged here at Disney,” Walt Disney Company CEO Bob Iger said in a statement. “I was immediately drawn into the vibrant world Katherine imagined and the possibilities of what we could do together with this story. Written by Katherine herself, these movies are in the best of hands with our Walt Disney Studios team, and I can’t wait to see this tale brought to the screen.” Walt Disney Pictures‘ Alan Bergman and David Greenbaum added, “Katherine Rundell has masterfully crafted a spectacular and immersive world with Impossible Creatures , and her vision is a perfect match for the Disney storytelling tradition. We are thrilled to collaborate with Katherine and Charles to bring this epic saga to life for audiences worldwide—it’s going to be an extraordinary adventure.” Originally reported by Brandon Schreur at SuperHeroHype. The post Disney Finds Next Big Fantasy Franchise Following Huge Bidding War appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

In March 2025, Golden State’s Steph Curry became the first active player to accept an administrative position. Curry is the assistant general manager for the Davidson men’s basketball team. Since then, players like Trae Young, Damian Lillard, and Terrance Mann have accepted similar positions at their respective schools. On Tuesday, October 7, Celtics’ Jayson Tatum […] The post The Duke Blue Devils named Jayson Tatum their Chief Basketball Officer appeared first on Basketball Insiders | NBA Rumors And Basketball News. View the full article

Steve Adams Good morning! I’ll get going around 1pm CT, but feel free to submit questions ahead of time, as always. Good afternoon! Let’s get underway Derek Do Alec Bohm and A Garcia get non tendered? Not sure either team wants to commit 10+million to them Steve Adams I think Bohm will be non-tendered. Garcia has a chance to be traded somewhere to a team looking to buy low, but a NT is still possible there. I think he’s done with the Rangers one way or another. Brooklyngail Your prediction. Does HSK pick up his option and stay in Atlanta or does he test the market? Steve Adams No, I expect him to head back to the market. He got more than 1/16 when he was fresh off shoulder surgery. Even if it’s another two-year deal with an opt-out, he should be able to lock in more guaranteed money now that he’s healthy — plus the market is devoid of actual shortstop options.Braves could always try to get him to sign on for a new three- or four-year deal before he declines the option, but if my choices are “he exercises it or declines it,” I’m pretty comfortably in the latter camp. Depressed Oriole Mountcastle worth 8 mil in a trade or non tender more likely? Steve Adams I’d lean toward the non-tender, but he’s not a Nate Lowe-esque lock to be non-tendered. I could see a team giving up a negligible return to plug him in at 1B/DH at that price. Squints Does Woody end up back with Brewers next year? Read more Steve Adams No, I fully expect him to turn down his end of the mutual option and land a multi-year deal beyond what the Brewers feel they can pay. Given how adept they’ve proven at finding affordable starting pitching, paying market price for Woodruff coming off shoulder/lat injuries doesn’t seem like the best use of their resources — fan favorite or not. Guest Rank the projected total contract value of the top SP this winter: Bieber, Valdez, King, and Suarez Steve Adams Framber and Ranger are ahead of Bieber and King based on recent health, age and track record. I’d probably go Bieber ahead of King right now just because King’s health is a total wild card and Bieber is healthy/pitching in October.Valdez and Suarez are both comfortable nine-figure guys for me Ian Any realistic landing spots for Alonso other than the Mets? Steve Adams Plenty. I don’t think he’ll be back in Queens. Red Sox, Angels, Reds, Mariners, Padres, Rangers, Guardians all make varying degrees of sense, though skeptical about the Texas fit after the Bochy departure and the “financial uncertainty” talk. Obviously not all of those teams are realistic fits (Cleveland’s not paying him $100MM+), but having some of those clubs on the periphery of the market is enough to keep some of the others bidding more seriously. Pretty good fit in Boston, where Craig Breslow sidestepped when asked if he could commit to Casas as his 1B next year the other day. Adge Do you like Toronto to sign one of Bieber, Framber, King, Cease, Woodruff,or Ranger, Steve Adams I like the Jays to add at least one notable starter this winter, yeah — whether that’s signing one of those guys or trading for a Mitch Keller, Joe Ryan, whoever.Currently they have Gausman, Yesavage, Berrios, Lauer and a bunch of question marks. (Lauer is a question himself, really) And after 2026, Gausman is a free agent and Berrios can opt out. I think they’ll be in the market for multiple SPs MoonbeamMcSwine Does Chaim Bloom “clean house” w/ the Cardinals.. choosing to stock their farm system over competing against perhaps the toughest division in baseball (w/ Milwaukee & Chicago)? Steve Adams I don’t expect too many “untouchables” for the Cards this winter. They’re not moving Masyn Winn or JJ Wetherholt, but beyond the pricey veterans (Arenado, Gray, Contreras) I expect them to be open to offers on Brendan Donovan, Lars Nootbaar, Nolan Gorman, Alec Burleson, JoJo Romero, etc. etc. Larry from Clarksville Can you explain Imanaga’s contract and if you think the Cubs exercise the club option given his alarming home run issues? Steve Adams Cubs have to choose whether to pick up a three-year, $57MM club option — effectively extending him through 2028. If they decline, he can pick up a $15MM player option for 2026 or decline and head to free agency.If Imanaga exercises his player option, the Cubs would have a two-year club option after 2026. If the team declined that, he’d have another player option for 2027. I am increasingly coming around on the idea that maybe they just don’t want to commit $19MM per year to him for another three seasons, which would’ve seemed silly to me a few months ago. I was texting a bit with MLBTR’s Tim Dierkes and Anthony Franco about this last night. Tim, being in Chicago and closer to the situation than I am up in St. Paul, said he still leans toward the Cubs taking the safe route and picking up the option, but yeah … them declining is definitely a scenario that seems plausible now in a way that was not true even in like, July. I think if the Cubs decline their option, he’ll turn down the player option and do better than $15MM on the open market. Adam W. Will Pete Alonso or Alex Bregman get a bigger free agent contract this winter? Steve Adams Bregman, easily Craig Wandy Peralta of the Padres has a 4.45 million player option for 2026. Do you think he exercises the option to remain in San Diego or does he decline and become a free agent? Steve Adams I could see it going either way but I lean toward exercising it since he also has a $4.45MM player option for 2027. He’s guaranteed two years and $8.9MM right now, and the last time he was a free agent (two years younger, throwing a bit harder and with a better K%), the market didn’t exactly love him. Luxury Tax Does contract money changing hands a/effect a teams luxury tax total? If the Reds were to add an expensive player via trade this winter but the former team sends some money with that player, how does the luxury tax “hit” get allocated? All on Cinci because they have the player? readjusted for Cinci because their dollars will be smaller than the contract? *Cinci used as a placeholder since we all know they will never approach even the hint of Luxury Tax waters* Steve Adams The money changing hands impacts the CBT hit. If the Cardinals were to trade Sonny Gray back to Cincinnati for a reunion (sticking with your “this won’t happen” motif), the CBT hit would be recalibrated to reflect what’s remaining on the contract. So for the Cardinals, Gray has been a $25MM CBT hit. He signed a three-year, $75MM deal, and CBT hits are based on AAV.When the player is traded, however, the acquiring team is taxed based on what’s left. Gray would be a $40MM CBT hit for the Reds. If the Cards kicked in $25MM to help offset that, then he’d still count $25MM against the Cardinals’ tax number and $15MM against the Reds’. (That $40MM being derived from Gray’s $35MM salary in 2026 plus the $5MM buyout on his 2027 option) TxDude Will we ever see the Red Sox be a force in free agency like they used to be? I feel like it was always either Boston or New York that all the FAs wanted to sign with Steve Adams They just guaranteed $120MM to Bregman last winter!But I get the question. That was more an opportunistic “soft” (heavy usage of air quotes there, haha) landing for Bregman. I imagine at some point, they’ll be more willing to spend aggressively early in the winter but think the actions of ownership over the past five to eight years have increasingly suggested they prefer not to revisit the “let’s beat the market for a 31-year-old David Price” well anytime soon. So … probably somewhere in between the two extremes we’ve seen. Possibly as soon as this winter, since I do think they’ll look into higher-end SPs Carson Is there a team that would be interested in a Josh Jung trade? He surely has some value with 3 remaining years of club control and a relatively cheap projected $3M ARB1. Steve Adams Absolutely. Tigers, Pirates, Nats, Marlins, Mariners, Royals (move Maikel Garcia to 2B) … I can think of plenty who’d love to roll the dice on Jung, and I do think the Rangers will be open to exploring that possibility this winter. Cleveland Think we could pry one of Adley/Neto with our farm? Steve Adams Neto feels like an extreme long shot. Rutschman a bit more plausible, but Mike Elias has spoken repeatedly — including on our podcast — about how he fully anticipates Adley to be catching in Baltimore next year. He’s naturally stopped short of definitively declaring “I will not trade this player,” but they’d be selling low and Basallo hasn’t exactly shown he’s ready for a full season as a big league catcher yet. O’s also probably aren’t all that keen on dealing Rutschman “just” for prospects.(Nor would the Angels be keen on doing that with Neto, for what it’s worth) PolarBearLeaving? You mentioned Alonso and also Bregman. If what you say is true about Alonso leaving/not being resigned, what about the Mets signing Bregman to play 3rd and Murakami to play 1st. That would certainly change the vibe and core and you might make up some (but not all) of Alonso Steve Adams Yeah I think the Mets will be in on both Bregman and Munetaka Murakami, who, for those unaware, is a 25-year-old (26 in Feb) corner infielder who’s hit 22 homers in 224 PAs in Japan this season and will be posted in the offseason. He also has significant defensive and strikeout concerns, but he’s still going to get paid by a major league team because of the 80 raw power. John Could Cedric Mullins return to the Orioles? Steve Adams If he’s out there in February and hasn’t found a deal to his liking, sure I can see him going back for a year. I wouldn’t predict it as likely, but it’s not as through any bridges were burned there (at least not that I’m aware of) Mr. Skenes Am I pitching for the Pirates next year? Steve Adams Yyyyyyyup Allen Brooks Lee didn’t make a claim to his SS spot after the Correa trade. Are there any SS available in trade? Preferably in the Twins budget Steve Adams They’ll give Lee a full year to show whether he can hack it, and if not, they’ve got Kaelen Culpepper, another former first-rounder and top-100-y guy, coming along relatively quickly @tayyyburrr Lifelong Padre fan here. Does AJ Preller get any credit for at least trying to build a winner? I know “we” haven’t won anything, but being an annual “contender” has to count for something, right?!? Steve Adams Gets credit from me. I wish there were more GMs/presidents of baseball ops like Preller, Dipoto, Dombrowski, etc. I feel like so many baseball ops leaders today operate with a risk-averse approach, so as not to risk their job security. And that’s understandable! These guys are paid enormous seven-figure salaries. But it’s also boring. Give me chaos. Always chaos. It’s more fun. Preller is pure entertainment. And he’s better than his detractors give him credit for. Craig Breslow Would the Royals take Duran straight up for Bubic? Should I? Steve Adams The Royals would. The Red Sox wouldn’t. Three years of control remaining for Duran to one for Bubic. BeBopCola What was your preseason World Series pick and what is it now? Steve Adams Dodgers over Mariners so now I have to stubbornly stick to it! GM job As an impartial non Rockies fan. who would want their GM job given the terrible state of affairs throughout their organization ? They have almost no chance of making the playoffs for many years in the NL West with LA,SD, AZ and SF. Thanks. Steve Adams There’s only 30 of these jobs, first and foremost. So yes, plenty of people would want it. Beyond that, imagine being able to claim your legacy as the person who finally brought winning baseball to Colorado. You’d be a legend.Any front office leader is hypercompetitive and driven by challenge. Turning the Rockies around is an Everest-ian challenge (to use a terrible mountain-related analogy) Jim What prospects would the A’s have to give up in order to get Brady Singer from the Reds? Steve Adams I don’t think Singer would cost a ton in trade. He has a little surplus value, probably, but one year of him at $12MM … it’s not like he’s some raucous, unmitigated bargain. Couple middle-of-the-pack prospects (40 FV types) probably gets it done. He’d cost less than Springs cost them last winter. Natitude Zac Gallen a fit in Washington? Steve Adams I don’t think the Nats will be aiming that high in free agency, but any pitcher who can be reasonably expected to pitch anywhere close to league-average innings is a “fit” in D.C. based on what they have on the depth chart right now.Still amazed that the Nats (and Rockies, especially) passed on Alek Manoah. Don’t get me wrong, he’s probably just bad now, but for a bit more than $2MM, why not take the shot? He has minor league options left! Cards Am I the only cardinal fan that still has high hopes for Gorman? Sure he strikes out a ton and has a low average but I still believe there’s a 40 homer slugger around the corner. Steve Adams I think there should be a balance between “having hopes” and “having high hopes.”Hoping for Gorman to turn into a decent strikeout-prone slugger who’s a defensive liability but hits righties well enough to be a 2-ish win player, sure. But a 40-homer season from a guy whose power has dropped in consecutive seasons and who’s fanned in 34% of his career plate appearances feels ambitious to me. PJ You see Bendix aggressively trying to move Sandy this offseason or has he backed off on the prospect? Steve Adams I see him listening to whatever offers are presented and being content to carry Alcantara into the season if he’s getting low-balled coming off an uneven season. Hector Villanueva Where are earth so the Cubs play Moises next year. I think he’s ready, but he’s not an MLB catcher, they have Busch at 1st, and Suzuki at DH. Steve Adams They don’t need to pencil him in for 600 PAs. They can option him, and injuries will create openings for him. Plus, they could wind up playing Suzuki in the OF more if (when?) Tucker signs elsewhere. Obviously they still have Alcantara, but he didn’t exactly set the world on fire in AAA this year.Even if they were to go with Happ-PCA-Alcantara in the outfield and Suzuki at DH, there’s still a path for Ballesteros to get 300+ plate appearances next year with minimal time at catcher. And come 2027, Happ and Suzuki are free agents, which only makes it easier to get Moises into the lineup. HomerHanky Besides a new manager, what do YOU believe are the Twins biggest needs this off-seeason? Steve Adams An entire bullpen Yates to Rangers? Hi Steve. With Kirby Yates having a lousy year with the Dodgers, do you think a reunion to be the Rangers closer is possible? Steve Adams Plausible enough, but no reason to necessarily think it’s likely Melchez The Rockies need some talent… 1. Trade Kyle Freeland for prospect(s)… 2. Sign aging free agents looking for a chance to build up value and flip at deadline (1B Carlos Santana, DH Marcel Ozuna, CF Cedric Mullins) and 3. what’s stopping them from loading up on rule 5 guys? They have very little on the farm that’s close. Rockies have a long road ahead. Steve Adams I don’t think Freeland nets them much in a trade.A 40-year-old Carlos Santana’s not getting anything at next year’s deadline. Mullins, sure … adding some closer-to-prime-aged pillow guys like that makes sense, but those guys will have understandable concerns about playing at altitude regularly and what it does to recovery and performing on the road. Rule 5? Sure, go nuts. They should have several roster spots to work with, and I agree, why not grab two, three — even four guys if you like them better than what’s in your system? Obviously they won’t all stick, but might as well take some looks in spring training/early in the season. Pontiac bandit Steve, forgot about Owen Cassie in the Cubs OF next year, higher grade prospect then Alcantara. Steve Adams Ah yeah true, brain fart. Point generally still stands though. Two OF spots open post-2026, and injuries create ample opportunity, especially when the OF/DH is a carousel of 3-4 guys. Or rather a carousel of 4-5 guys. Words. Numbers. Hard. Brain no work good. Roper Could the Redbirds and Rangers match up on a Gray-Semien trade? Steve Adams The Cardinals want to create more opportunities for younger players. Bringing Semien aboard when he’s signed for three more years doesn’t really accomplish that. They’d much prefer to just keep Gray and have him eat innings until the deadline. I don’t know’s on 3rd This the year the M’s acually spend big on a hitter(not like the 2/24 Garv got)?? Steve Adams It’s just not really Jerry Dipoto’s preferred method of team-building, but I could see them at least trying to re-sign either Geno or Naylor (former feels likelier, given the prior connection and the fact that he’ll naturally be capped to a shorter term because of the age discrepancy) Cardinals What team do you think would actually take the contract of Sonny Gray? Mets, Giants, Phillies, Braves or Orioles have the money, maybe the Angels or Tigers as outside? Steve Adams I don’t think anyone would take the whole contract $40MM for one year is too steep for Gray — particularly for a team like the Mets or Phillies, who are third-time luxury payors in the top tier of penalty. It’s a 110% tax for them, meaning Gray costs them $84MM for one year. Cardinals need to eat $10-12MM or so just to move him for no return. Probably $15MM+ to get any kind of semi-decent prospect. Twins fan Do you think Lewin Diaz will get MLB interest again after his 50 homer season in Korea? Steve Adams I do Teams passed him around waivers like 10 times a few offseasons ago because they love the glove at 1B and he had power upside. He’s still under 30. I don’t think he’s going to sign a mammoth contract or anything, but yeah I think he has a real chance to get a major league deal Still-Krazy Does Ke’Bryan Hayes have any trade value Steve Adams Reds took basically the whole contract and gave up an actual prospect at the deadline. Hayes hit better in CIN than in PIT (albeit not much better). He could have some marginal value, but the Reds don’t make that trade if they’re not interested in keeping him for the foreseeable future. dub nation..under God can Reds…in any way….sign Schworber? Steve Adams Sure. If they offer more money than the Phillies. Simple, right?! Haha… It’s not likely, but hey, Schwarber’s from Cincinnati area.I would not bet on it, but I imagine they’ll talk to him and give it some kind of try. Dale Would a Taylor Ward for Brady Singer trade make sense? Steve Adams I think there’s some sense to that, yeah. pitching chaos for everyone The best ways to improve Mets defense is let Alonso leave, trade for Hoerner, and move Soto to primary DH. Any of those remotely likely? Steve Adams I think they’ll let Pete leave. The others, not particularly likely. My name jeff Where will nolan arenado get traded to this winter, and what will it take to get him Steve Adams This is framed like Arenado has positive value. He does not. It’ll take the Cardinals eating $30MMish of his remaining contract. Oz No mention of Raisel Iglesias. What kind of contract does he get? Steve Adams No reliever in the past decade has gotten more than 2 years for a free agent contract or extension starting at age 36 or older. So Iglesias is probably capped at two years. The high end of this range is Blake Treinen getting two years and $22MM total.I think Iglesias comes in around 1/14 or 2/20. (If you like that sort of answer, you can research stuff like that within seconds in our Contract Tracker!) Dave Do the Royals cut bait on India or pay him 9 million and hope he doens’t suck again? Steve Adams Non-tender Ang T Would adding 1 yr/$25M be enough to keep Edwin Diaz from opting out of his contract with the Mets? Steve Adams I don’t think so, but he re-upped in Queens really quickly last time, so maybe he’s just motivated to stay put. But I think his market value is $80MMish over four years, and tacking on 1/25 really “only” brings him closer to 3/60. Jason does trevor larnach have any trade value or is he a non-tender? Steve Adams Can see him being flipped for a nominal return. I don’t think he’s netting much, but low-spending/payroll-crunched teams might be intrigued as a change-of-scenery guy and his arb price is under $5MM I’ve got to call it for the week.Tim’s mailbag will run later today (I think) or possibly tomorrow, and Anthony will have a subscriber chat on Friday. I’m on X @Adams_Steve and Bluesky @adams-steve.bsky.social. If you want more opinions from the MLBTR team, you can learn about our Front Office subscription package and sign up here. In addition to ad-free viewing on the site and in the app, you’ll get weekly analysis/opinion columns from Anthony Franco and myself, a weekly mailbag column from Tim Dierkes, weekly fantasy baseball chats and columns with Nicklaus Gaut (during the season), weekly subscriber-only chats with Anthony and with me (where your odds of getting a question answered are much higher), extra insight from Darragh McDonald, access to our Contract Tracker (a vital offseason resource) our Agency Database, our GM Tracker, our ongoing Offseason Outlook series and more. Thanks everyone, and enjoy your week! View the full article

An 82-80 record is nothing to sneeze at in Kansas City, as it represented just the sixth time in the last 31 years that the Royals topped the .500 mark. Still, the Royals took a step back after reaching the playoffs in 2024, and will again be looking to bolster their lackluster offense. Guaranteed Contracts Bobby Witt Jr., SS: $272MM through 2034 (Witt can opt out after each of the final four years of the contract; Royals can trigger $89MM club option for 2035-37 seasons if Witt triggers all player options) Seth Lugo, SP: $43MM through 2027 (includes $3MM buyout of $17MM club/vesting option for 2028) Michael Wacha, SP: $33MM through 2027 (includes $1MM buyout of $14MM club option for 2028) Carlos Estevez, RP: $12MM through 2026 (includes $2M buyout of $13MM club option for 2027) Cole Ragans, SP: $12MM through 2027 (Royals hold arbitration control over Ragans for 2028 season) Option Decisions Salvador Perez, C: $13.5MM club option ($2MM buyout) Michael Lorenzen, SP: $12MM mutual option ($1.5MM buyout) Randal Grichuk, OF: $5MM mutual option ($3MM buyout) 2026 financial commitments (assuming only Perez's option is exercised): $79MM Total future commitments (assuming only Perez's option is exercised): $385.5MM Arbitration-Eligible Players (service time in parentheses; projections from MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz) Taylor Clarke (5.148): $1.9MM Kris Bubic (5.135): $6MM John Schreiber (5.027): $3.8MM Jonathan India (5.000): $7.4MM Kyle Wright (4.151): $1.8MM Kyle Isbel (4.043): $2.7MM Bailey Falter (3.138): $3.3MM Daniel Lynch IV (3.136): $1.3MM Sam Long (3.121): $950K Vinnie Pasquantino (3.101): $5.4MM Angel Zerpa (3.082): $1.2MM Michael Massey (3.068): $2MM MJ Melendez (3.016): $2.65MM Maikel Garcia (2.168): $4.8MM James McArthur (2.150): $800K Non-tender candidates: India, Wright, Falter, Long, Massey, Melendez, McArthur Free Agents Lorenzen, Grichuk, Mike Yastrzemski, Hunter Harvey, Adam Frazier, Luke Maile The Royals got an early jump on their offseason work when they agreed to a contract extension with Seth Lugo just before the trade deadline. Lugo's previous deal allowed him to opt out of the contract's final year and enter free agency this winter, and the Royals seemed to at least test the trade market just in case an extension couldn't be finalized. As it turned out, the veteran righty will now be staying in K.C. through at least the 2027 campaign, further solidifying the Royals' starting corps. The rotation was more good than elite this season, as injuries played a role. Lugo himself missed about a month and a half due to back and finger issues, Kris Bubic's All-Star season was ended by a rotator cuff strain in late July, and 2024 All-Star Cole Ragans was limited to 13 starts and 61 2/3 innings due to a rotator cuff strain of his own. The silver lining to these health issues was that Noah Cameron got the opportunity to break into the rotation, as the rookie delivered a 2.99 ERA over his first 138 1/3 frames in the majors. Better health is obviously no guarantee for 2026, yet assuming the Royals deal with just an average amount of injury misfortune, their rotation looks like one of the more solid on-paper units in baseball. The Royals have fewer questions about their starting pitching than most clubs, due to both a high talent floor and plenty of depth. Mutual options are almost always declined anyway, but Michael Lorenzen probably would've been moving on regardless considering all of the other pitching options on hand. Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription BENEFITS Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco. Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony. Remove ads and support our writers. Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker View the full article

Photo Credit: 20th Century Studios Predator: Badlands has received a surprising MPA rating that has left some fans feeling disappointed. Predator: Badlands opens in United States theaters next month. Directed by Dan Trachtenberg, the 20th Century Studios sequel movie stars Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi and Elle Fanning. What is Predator: Badland’s MPA rating? Predator: Badlands will receive a PG-13 rating. This makes it the first movie in the main Predator franchise to not be rated R; although, the 2004 Alien vs. Predator crossover movie was also rated PG-13. Some fans were disappointed to learn this news, while others are approaching it with optimism and putting their faith in Trachtenberg. Producer Ben Rosenblatt told IGN that, despite the PG-13 rating, Badlands will still have plenty of alien violence for fans to enjoy. He said that they intended to make a PG-13 film that “feels like an R” in an effort to “broaden out the audience for a movie like this. “We don’t have any humans in the movie, and so we don’t have any human red blood,” he said. “So we’re hoping that’s gonna play to our advantage. We’re going to go as hard as we possibly can within those constraints, and we think we’ll be able to do some pretty awesomely gruesome stuff. But in colors other than red.” It’s worth noting that Predator: Badlands has not yet received an official MPA on FilmRatings.com or 20th Century Studios. While it’s still expected to get a PG-13, the official reasoning behind the rating has not yet been disclosed. The synopsis for Predator: Badlands reads, “Set in the future on a deadly remote planet, Badlands follows a young Predator outcast (played by newcomer Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi) who finds an unlikely ally in Thia (Emmy and Golden Globe nominee Elle Fanning) as he embarks on a treacherous journey in search of the ultimate adversary.” Predator: Badlands will be released on November 7, 2025. Originally reported by Brandon Schreur at SuperHeroHype. The post Predator: Badlands MPA Rating Has Fans Disappointed in Sci-Fi Movie appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

The Houston Rockets have an open roster spot and will likely file for a $14.1 million disabled player exception (DPE) after star point guard Fred VanVleet suffered a torn ACL at an unofficial team minicamp in the Bahamas. If the NBA determines VanVleet is out until mid-June, the league would grant the exception, which would […] The post Rockets Expected To File For $14.1M DPE After Fred VanVleet’s Injury appeared first on Basketball Insiders | NBA Rumors And Basketball News. View the full article

http://blogs.fangraphs.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Quinn-Priester-Bryan-Woo-Logan-Webb.pngCharles LeClaire, Neville E. Guard, Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images This season, four different starters suffered a loss in which they went exactly six innings, struck out exactly six batters, and allowed exactly seven hits, three earned runs, and no unearned runs. Three of them faced the exact same number of batters. But those four pitchers all finished with different pitching lines because they all walked a different number of batters. Our regular season database goes back to 1871, and it contains 241,730 games, each of them unique. In 1927, Bob Smith set a record by facing a whopping 89 batters in a 4-3, 22-inning loss to the Cubs. In 2021, Pablo López became the first starter ever to be charged with a loss after plunking the one and only batter he faced. There may be 50 ways to leave your lover and 5,000 ways to die, but the various ways to lose a baseball game are unconstrained by any such limits. I could keep on going. In 1959, Harvey Haddix was perfect through 12 innings, then lost the game and the perfecto in the 13th. Five years later, Ken Johnson of the Houston Colt .45s pitched the only complete-game no-hitter in history to end as a loss. I bring up these performances because, watching these playoffs, I can’t help but think about pitchers who earn losses despite pitching brilliantly. Just last night in the NLDS matchup between the Dodgers and Phillies, Jesús Luzardo threw six scoreless innings and retired 17 batters in a row, but he took the loss when two inherited runners scored. Last week, Nick Pivetta took the loss after allowing two runs over five innings to the Cubs, and on the same day, Gavin Williams took a loss for the Guardians because he allowed two unearned runs over six innings. Today, we’re specifically looking for the pitchers who put up great numbers across all of their losses during the 2025 season. This doesn’t necessarily mean the pitchers who had the worst run support or defense behind them overall. It just means that specifically during the games they went on to lose, they pitched particularly well. Hard luck losses will always happen. As Jacob deGrom can tell you from long experience, any pitcher good enough to hold the other team to a single run will eventually suffer a 1-0 loss. (In fact, all five of the top spots on that particular Stathead search belong to Hall of Famers, with Walter Johnson and Nolan Ryan tied at 63. Amazingly, Johnson, the second-winningest pitcher of all time, also lost 13 games in which he didn’t allow a single earned run, the highest mark ever.) But it takes a confluence of factors to end the season with great numbers across all of your losses. Just ask Quinn Priester. After years of prospect hype, Preister broke out to the tune of a 3.32 ERA and 13-3 record with the Brewers this season. Although he only lost three games, he ran an ERA of 3.00 in those losses, the best loss-only ERA of any starter with more than one loss. Priester allowed five earned runs over 15 innings in his three losses. He ran a 2.30 FIP, but the Brewers scored a total of two runs in those three games, and errors cost Priester two unearned runs. The Brewers boasted the game’s ninth-best offense and sixth-best defense this season, and they’re on the verge of sweeping the Cubs in the NLDS. That’s just plain bad luck. Logan Webb turned in arguably the best season of his excellent career, finishing fifth among all pitchers with 5.5 WAR, but he knows a little something about bad luck too. He ran a 3.22 ERA and 2.60 FIP overall, making 2025 his fifth straight season with an ERA below 3.50 and an FIP below 3.20. However, it’s easy to imagine things going even better for Webb. He finished 15-11, and those 26 total decisions put him in a tie for the third-most in baseball. As you’d expect, he got so many decisions because he led all of baseball with 207 innings pitched. Webb ran inverse ERAs, putting up a 2.40 mark in wins and a 4.20 mark in losses, but don’t let that fool you. Across his 11 losses, he put up a 2.97 FIP because he struck out 67 batters and walked just 10. The Giants averaged fewer than two runs per game in his losses and exceeded three runs just three times. Seven times this season, Webb earned either a loss or a no-decision despite surrendering two or fewer runs, and he went at least six innings in six of those seven starts. Had a few more bounces gone Webb’s way, he might have ended up with 20 wins and we might have ended up with a good old fashioned shouting match about whether or not Paul Skenes really deserved the NL Cy Young with a 10-10 record and a 1.97 ERA. Speaking of Skenes, the presumptive Cy Young certainly wasn’t terrible over the course of his 10 losses; he ran a 4.29 ERA and 4.23 FIP. However, across those 10 losses, the Pirates scored just 11 total runs – 11 runs in 10 games! Somehow, when Skenes left those games, he’d kept the Pirates within two runs of the lead six times. Unfortunately for him, they would only go on to score two total runs after his departures. Bryan Woo deserves a special mention here. Although he earned his seven losses, running a 4.98 ERA and 5.07 FIP during them, he was the only pitcher in baseball to average more than six innings per start in his losses. Mariners manager Dan Wilson really let Woo work deep, and even more impressive, he didn’t seem to be guilty of just leaving his ace in until he exploded. Woo only coughed up a lead in his final inning in two of those seven losses, and Wilson only pulled him mid-inning once. We’ll finish with another playoff performer in Tyler Glasnow. Glasnow got into 18 games during the regular season, but across his three losses, he held opposing batters to a miniscule .510 OPS. That was lowest mark of the 199 different pitchers with at least three losses this season, and nearly 100 points below Glasnow’s .607 OPS in wins and no-decisions. He allowed just one home run and ran a WHIP of 0.88 in those three losses, but the Dodgers scored a grand total of just two runs in them. All the performances I’ve highlighted here are impressive in their own way, but I’ve also checked the historical record, and we didn’t see anything truly spectacular in terms of bad luck this year. If you run a Stathead search for the pitchers with the best loss-only ERAs of all-time, you’ll find 15 different pitchers who lost at least five games in a season while allowing a grand total of zero earned runs, including Cy Young in 1906. Only two pitchers from this century even crack the top 100. The biggest reason for this is that unearned runs have been dropping precipitously since the beginning of baseball history, as you can see from this graph of UERA (that’s unearned run average, for the uninitiated): http://blogs.fangraphs.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ALNL-Unearned-Run-Average1.png In 1900, 31% of all runs were unearned. This year, that number was just below 8%. This is easy to explain. Fielding has improved dramatically over the years, and as Sam Miller has documented, grade inflation has made its way to the official scorer’s desk, making it harder to earn an error than ever before. Knowing this, you might assume that it would be impossible for one of today’s pitchers to put up a historical season in the bad luck department, but that’s not quite true. If we look at the lowest loss-only ERAs after World War II, we see a whole lot of entries from 1968, The Year of the Pitcher, but a third of the entries are from the past 25 years, and two of them are from within the past decade. Michael Pineda’s 2014 season is at the very top of the list. Pineda went 5-5 with a 1.89 ERA that season. During those five losses, his ERA was still an astonishing 2.08. Unfortunately for Pineda, the Yankees scored just two runs in those five games! Best Loss-Only ERA Since 1946 Player Year ERA L UER OPS Michael Pineda 2014 2.08 5 2 .568 Bob Gibson 1968 2.14 9 8 .580 José Rijo 1991 2.25 6 3 .555 Tom Murphy 1968 2.27 6 3 .480 Sam McDowell 1968 2.34 14 19 .607 Bruce Howard 1966 2.43 5 2 .555 Pedro Martínez 2000 2.44 6 0 .496 Steve Barber 1968 2.5 5 10 .640 Steve Rogers 1973 2.57 5 2 .666 Brett Oberholtzer 2013 2.7 5 3 .661 Pablo Torrealba 1977 2.7 6 3 .653 Jacob deGrom 2018 2.71 9 3 .590 John Denny 1984 2.75 7 4 .630 Clarke Schmidt 2024 2.77 5 3 .626 Dean Chance 1964 2.79 9 3 .664 Bobby Shantz 1957 2.86 5 5 .688 Source: Stathead Minimum of five losses. Unsurprisingly, we also see deGrom’s Cy Young 2018 season on the list. He joins Bob Gibson and Pedro Martínez in making the list while winning the award. deGrom went 10-9, and the Mets scored 11 total runs in those nine games. The line I really want you to notice, though, is Clarke Schmidt’s. Schmidt ran a 2.77 ERA over five losses just last year! Schmidt went 5-5 and the Yankees scored 11 runs in his five losses. However, eight of those 11 runs came after Schimdt had left the game! Even less fortunate for Schimdt, the Yankees went on to win in all six of his no-decisions! The Yankees had no problem scoring runs during Schmidt’s starts. They just weren’t inclined to do so while he was actually on the mound and in a position to benefit from them. All of this is to say that although nobody cracked the list this year, today’s pitchers still have a chance. With the right season-long combination of great pitching, paltry run support, bad defense, and runs from inherited runners, anyone could end up at the top of this dubious Stathead search. They probably wouldn’t consider this good news, though. Source View the full article

(Image Credit: Lionsgate/Universal Pictures) Michael, the long-awaited movie about Michael Jackson, reportedly experienced major changes during reshoots. What changes occurred for the Michael Jackson biopic? Michael’s journey from production to the big screen has been tumultuous. Originally scheduled for a 2025 release, Michael was delayed until 2026 due to reshoots. The movie’s third act reportedly touched on Jackson’s sexual abuse allegations in the early ’90s. However, an agreement between the Jackson estate and the pop star’s accuser was already in place, stating that Jackson’s accuser should not be included in the film. According to Puck’s Matthew Belloni, Michael’s reshoots are complete, and the movie now features a different ending. “Additional photography has now wrapped, and the film ends after Jackson’s triumphant rise to fame in the ’80s,” Belloni wrote. “So all the footage of MJ’s later King of Pop (and scandal-plagued) years, including two weeks of shooting at Neverland Ranch, now owned by Ron Burkle, is unusable.” Due to the first cut being nearly four hours, Lionsgate has considered splitting Michael into two movies. Because of the reshoots and financial gamble, a second movie is not guaranteed. “Producer Graham King’s plan is to make a second Michael movie that would include all that stuff, plus a significant amount of additional, yet-to-be-shot footage with stars Jaafar Jackson, Colman Domingo, and Miles Teller, but that will now depend on — yes, you guessed it — how the film is received by audiences next April,” Belloni added. “If it’s a hit, or if all signs are pointing that direction, they greenlight part two, and if not, producers eat all that unused footage.” Jafaar Jackson stars as Michael Jackson. Jafaar is Michael’s nephew and the son of Michael’s brother, Jermaine. The rest of the ensemble includes Colman Domingo, Nia Long, Miles Teller, Laura Harrier, Kat Graham, Larenz Tate, and Derek Luke. Antoine Fuqua directs Michael from a screenplay by John Logan. Lionsgate will release Michael in the United States, while Universal will handle international distribution. Belloni’s report mentioned that the Michael trailer will be attached to showings of Wicked: For Good in November. Michael opens in theaters on April 24, 2026. The post Michael Jackson Movie Reshoots Significantly Changed Ending, Sequel Not Guaranteed appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

Photo Credit: @espncfb / YouTube After Paul Finebaum controversially claimed in last week’s interview with Outlook that he had an interest in running for the Senate, rumors about ESPN banning him emerged. This sparked a range of reactions from fans and even prompted a minor political debate. However, it seems that this report is not true, and Paul Finebaum remains part of ESPN shows. ESPN executive clarifies that Paul Finebaum has not been banned despite rumors Rumors emerged on Monday that ESPN had banned Paul Finebaum from its shows. They followed the controversial interview where Finebaum addressed the possibility of running for a Senate seat. While the possibility surprised many, few expected ESPN to take action. Rumors soon circulated about tension between Finebaum and ESPN. Outkick’s Clay Travis reported that ESPN had frozen Finebaum out of the network. In a X (formerly known as Twitter) post, Travis wrote, “Per sources: Disney/ESPN has removed @finebaum from appearing on @ESPN since his @outkick interview expressing interest in running as a Republican for senate in Alabama. ESPN has canceled all network appearances on all shows, including some that have occurred for a decade plus.” Since Travis’s report, other outlets have refuted the claim that Paul Finebaum was canceled by ESPN. More importantly, ESPN vice president of communications Bill Hofheimer reshared the tweet and wrote, “This is not true at all. The below is TOTALLY FALSE,” confirming that Paul Finebaum remains with ESPN. Sports Business Journal also confirmed that Finebaum will appear on ESPN’s First Take on Tuesday morning. The past week’s interview drew significant attention because Finebaum openly supported Trump and expressed interest in politics. Although he has not appeared on any ESPN program since, his return does not seem far off. The post No, ESPN Has Not Banned Paul Finebaum from Its Shows appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

Today’s Featured Book Deals $1.99Woman of Light by Kali Fajardo-AnstineGet This Deal $2.99Society of Lies by Lauren Ling BrownGet This Deal $1.99Spinning Silver by Naomi NovikGet This Deal $1.99Academy for Liars by Alexis HendersonGet This Deal $2.99Just for the Summer by Abby JimenezGet This Deal $2.99By Any Other Name by Jodi PicoultGet This Deal $1.99There’s Always This Year by Hanif AbdurraqibGet This Deal $1.99Fingersmith by Sarah WatersGet This Deal $1.99The Bog Wife by Kay ChronisterGet This Deal $1.99A Cruel Thirst by Angela MontoyaGet This Deal $1.99A Sunny Place for Shady People by Mariana Enriquez, Megan McDowell (trans.)Get This Deal $1.99The Seventh Veil of Salome by Silvia Moreno-GarciaGet This Deal $1.99By the Fire We Carry by Rebecca NagleGet This Deal $1.99Heart Berries by Terese Marie MailhotGet This Deal $1.99It’s Elementary by Elise BryantGet This Deal $1.99Cantoras by Caro de RobertisGet This Deal In Case You Missed Yesterday’s Most Popular Book Deals $2.99Awakened by A.E. OsworthGet This Deal $1.99The Gene by Siddhartha MukherjeeGet This Deal $2.99American Scary: A History of Horror, from Salem to Stephen King and Beyond by Jeremy DauberGet This Deal $1.99Babel by R. F KuangGet This Deal View the full article

Photo Credit: Netflix Netflix has officially released The Witcher‘s Season 4 trailer, previewing the upcoming entry in the long-running series. The Witcher Season 4 is set to debut on Netflix on October 30, 2025. “After the Continent-altering events of Season Three, Geralt, Yennefer, and Ciri find themselves separated by a raging war and countless enemies,” reads the official synopsis for Season 4 of The Witcher. “As their paths diverge, and their goals sharpen, they stumble on unexpected allies eager to join their journeys. And if they can accept these found families, they just might have a chance at reuniting for good…” Check out The Witcher Season 4 trailer below: What does The Witcher Season 4 trailer? The new trailer of The Witcher sees Geralt continuing his search for Ciri. As he looks to reunite with her, Ciri also forges her own path forward and both find their paths beginning to diverge following Season 3’s events. Season 4 of The Witcher will star Liam Hemsworth as Geralt of Rivia and will also star Anya Chalotra as Yennefer of Vengerberg, Freya Allan as Princess Cirilla of Cintra, Joey Batey as Jaskier, Laurence Fishburne as Regis, Eamon Farren as Cahir, Anna Shaffer as Triss Merrigold, Mimî M Khayisa as Fringilla, Cassie Clare as Philippa, Mahesh Jadu as Vilgefortz, and more. The Witcher Season 4 was created by Lauren Schmidt Hissrich, who returns as showrunner and executive producer. The season was written by Hissrich, Tania Lotia, Rae Benjamin, Troy Dangerfield, Matthew D’Ambrosio, Javier Grilllo-Marxuach, Clare Higgins, and Mike Ostrowski. Originally reported by Anthony Nash on SuperHeroHype. The post The Witcher Season 4 Trailer Features the Debut of Liam Hemsworth’s Geralt appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

The return of the Skins Game shows how much has changed in 17 years. The four players are among the top six in the world, it's moving from the California desert to South Florida and it will be broadcast on Prime Video instead of network TV.View the full article

Jon Rahm, who plays in Madrid this week after a short break, said the Ryder Cup was "mentally the toughest week of my career" but also "the most fun I've had."View the full article

Photo Credit: ITN Distribution An upcoming horror flick titled The Ritual House was actually filmed in a real-life haunted location. The Ritual House is a new film directed by Crystal J. Huang. Distributed by ITN and written by Donna Spangler, it stars social media star Lauren Francesca as a character named Courtney Cable. The cast also includes Spangler, Huang, Keiara Scranton, Neil Bentley Fierro, Bron Theron, Anna Yosin, Brandon Lill, Arthur Peng, Curt Clendenin, and David L. Klein. Watch a trailer for the movie below (watch more trailers and clips): What do we know about The Ritual House? The Ritual House was filmed almost entirely inside the real home of two of the movie’s lead actors. The film’s characters were written using the actors’ real names, and many working on the project experienced “chilling events no script could have staged” during production. “Francesca described a terrifying moment when she felt an invisible shove in the backyard, sending her tumbling into the pool. Lights flickered and flashed randomly throughout filming,” a press release for the film reads. “ In one late-night incident, the homeowner discovered the basement light blazing — though no one had entered — and reported strange noises echoing from the shadows. The supernatural activity wasn’t limited to the cast. A longtime housekeeper, asked to stay and care for pets during filming, refused to remain overnight, claiming she saw shifting shadows and felt a ‘presence’ in the halls.” One of Huang’s close friends developed “sudden welts and scratches on his legs” while visiting the set, while some props would randomly shatter or turn on and off without warning. “The Ritual House tells the story of two friends who awaken something ancient after turning their inherited home into a short-term rental,” a description of the movie’s plot reads. The Ritual House will have its world premiere on October 24, 2025, at The Chabot Theatre in Castro Valley, California. It will also launch on Tubi on the same day before arriving on other digital platforms, such as Roku and Fandango at Home, later in October. Source: ITN Distribution The post New Horror Movie The Ritual House’s Set Was Actually Haunted appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article

Photo Credit: Manoli Figetakis/Getty Images After Ego Nwodim departed SNL, Sherri Shepherd called out the lack of diversity in the late-night sketch comedy show’s Season 51 premiere on her own daytime talk show, urging them to hire a Black comic for the cast. She called it an “emergency.” Here’s what Sherri Shepherd said about SNL needing a Black woman after Ego Nwodim’s departure. Sherri Shepherd asks SNL to cast a Black woman following Ego Nwodim’s departure Sherri Shepherd was quick to notice the lack of diversity in the premiere episode of SNL Season 51. Ego Nwodim’s departure left the episode with no Black women. Though the show hired five new cast members — Tommy Brennan, Jeremy Culhane, Ben Marshall, Kam Patterson, and Veronika Slowikowska — Nwodim’s exit came after the new casting. This left little diversity in the group. Addressing this, Sherri Shepherd said, “When I watched Saturday Night Live this weekend, I did notice something was missing: Ego Nwodim left the show. She was their only Black female cast member, so now there are no Black women on SNL. So what do I say to SNL? Y’all gotta hurry up and you gotta find somebody, this is a break glass in case of an emergency. It is an emergency.” She repeatedly emphasized that SNL was the kind of show that needed diversity. “We gotta have representation on that show,” she added. She went on to recall the lack of diversity in the show from earlier years. Shepherd pointed out that the show often lacked enough Black cast members to portray real-life figures. She recalled, “When I cohosted The View, there was no Black woman on the show to play me… There was no Black woman to even play Whoopi [Goldberg] — Kenan Thompson would play Whoopi at the table when they spoofed us!” Shepherd acknowledged that Nwodim’s departure was a big blow, and it might be difficult to find a replacement right away. But she emphasized that there were a lot of talented people out there, and SNL should continue its search for someone to replace Nwodim. “SNL, do not disappoint us. You are charged!” she added. Hopefully, SNL will address this soon. The post Sherri Shepherd on Why SNL Must Cast a Black Woman After Ego Nwodim’s Exit appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More. View the full article